Jingilator 922 Posted March 11, 2018 (edited) I know this is a bit out of left field, but does anyone want a Fire Emblem vs. Capcom? For whatever reason, Nintendo vs. Capcom just seems too generic for me. Edited March 11, 2018 by lollygagger19 5 Titan3S, GoracW, SantasH and 2 others reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kingdombladesventus 53 Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) The better question, which physics/game mechanics would win. I'll root for Fire Emblem, but Capcom has characters that can easily beat them and their respecitive weapons. If it was the Tales of Series vs. Capcom, then The Tales Series would win for sure with their artes and magic artes. Opps, I forgot why I mentioned that. It's one thing FE could beat them with magic, but their magic is limited, unlike the Tales of Series. Distinctive, but unless sword users are the roster, or a ROBIN, then it should be balanced. Edited March 12, 2018 by kingdombladesventus Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheFVguy 49 Posted March 15, 2018 Why not Nintendo VS Capcom? I'm not a Fire Emblem, so to me that game would be pretty disappointed and I would ask "Why couldn't they just do Nintendo vs Capcom?". Sure, the Fire Emblem would be happy, but honestly, it would be a pretty dumb decision to just do the FE franchise when you could put in many more franchises in order for it to sell more. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jingilator 922 Posted March 15, 2018 Why not Nintendo VS Capcom? I'm not a Fire Emblem, so to me that game would be pretty disappointed and I would ask "Why couldn't they just do Nintendo vs Capcom?". Sure, the Fire Emblem would be happy, but honestly, it would be a pretty dumb decision to just do the FE franchise when you could put in many more franchises in order for it to sell more.Becuase Nintendo vs. Capcom would be such a generic choice for a crossover. We’ve got Smash Bros. for it, anyways (then again, we also have it for Fire Emblem vs. Capcom). Plus, Fire Emblem has just as expansive for options for a roster as all of Capcom. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheFVguy 49 Posted March 16, 2018 (edited) Becuase Nintendo vs. Capcom would be such a generic choice for a crossover. We’ve got Smash Bros. for it, anyways (then again, we also have it for Fire Emblem vs. Capcom). Plus, Fire Emblem has just as expansive for options for a roster as all of Capcom. That goes to almost all franchises when it comes roster options. I understand we have Smash, but when I think of Nintendo VS Capcom, I think of tournament fighter, such as Street Fighter and Darkstalkers. I would really love for Nintendo characters to be in these kinds of games, it would incredibly fun. Edited March 16, 2018 by TheFVguy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
