Search the Community

I'm not a fan of Apple. I've never purchased an Apple product, nor will I ever do so. But this movie looks quite good. Can't wait to watch it later this year.

Made me re-realize how silly the whole zombie concept is. People actually prepare for this happening?

Hey everyone, how's it going? Well, just now I was watching videos on YouTube, and I happened to come upon this epic trailer for a movie that is coming out in 2014 called "The Lego Movie." I mean seriously, this is frickin awesome! When I saw all the different lego's from different time periods, it made me think about Wreck it Ralph. So this is the kind of Wreck it Ralph of Legos. This movie looks epic! LOL, watch for the funny part where Batman appears, it's hilarious!

Hey there everyone, how's it going? Well, I know that this movie came out a while ago, but for those who haven't seen it, here's my review of it. And don't worry, I'll avoid as many spoilers as I can. Okay, so this movie is based on the book of the same name by Margaret Stohl and Kami Garcia, and it tells the story of a teenager named Ethan Lawson Wate, who for months has had strange dreams about a girl he's never met, and one day a girl named Lena Duchaness, niece of the infamous town shut-in Macon Ravenwood, comes to Jackson High and everyone bullies her for being a relative of Macon Ravenwood. Ethan befriends this girl and they begin a friendship that turns into love, and he find out many more things related to her family. The movie is quite good, but I had read the book before seeing the movie, and there are many things absent in the movie. (I know that this happens a lot with book based movies, but I want to point these things out.) For example, in the book Macon has a wolf dog named Boo Radley, and he played a key role during the book, and yet he's not present in the movie, and characters Reece, Ryan, and Barclay don't make an appearance, and the infamous "Sixteen Moons" song that goes through all the book doesn't even get a mention in the movie. There are some other things that are quite out of place but I won't mention so that you people can investigate. In my personal opinion, the movie is a decent enough adaption, but it doesn't have the same captivating essence of the book, and we know this happens with most books. I would have preferred that Beautiful Creatures be adapted into an anime, since the premise and characters would fit perfectly in anime style adaption. But anyways, that's my review of the movie.

There are two kinds of people in the world: people who love Star Wars, and people who love Star Trek. Me, I was always a Star Wars person, so when Star Trek was getting rebooted in 2009, I honestly wasn't interested at first. But as it turns out, the reboot by J.J. Abrams (who ironically is now going to be directing Star Wars) was surprisingly awesome, and I found myself anticipating whatever it was that Abrams had planned next for the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise. Well, 4 years later, he has released Star Trek Into Darkness, a sequel that promises to be bigger in every way over its predecesor. But does bigger necessarily mean better? Here's my review. Keep in mind that this is MY review. Your opinion may very well differ from mine. Story The movie follows the crew of the U.S.S Enterprise, led by captain James T. Kirk (Chris Pine). Despite the events of the first movie, he has yet to fully realize the responsibilities that come with being captain, and still acts rather recklessly for someone of his position. However, after a former Federation soldier that goes by the name of John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch) launches a series of terrorist attacks against the Federation, Kirk is given the job of tracking down this one man force of destruction down, and bringing him to justice. As conspiracies unravel and Kirk's hunt for Harrison goes on, Kirk must realize the duties that come with being captain, and finding the answer to a question plaguing him: how far is he willing to go to protect the only family he has left, his crew? J.J Abrams certainly delivers on his promise to make this movie bigger than the original Star Trek from 2009. The action and the stakes are far higher than they were. Now that the origins are out of the way and we've been properly introduced to the characters already, this allows the movie to focus on its own story and the action far more, which works to Into Darkness's advantage. Much like the 2009 movie, this movie's biggest strength is its pacing. In both these movies, whether there was action on screen or dialogue, I was never bored, because the interaction between characters is just as fun to watch as all the space fights and explosions. What surprised me about this movie, is the emotion in it. Into Darkness takes cues from a story told way back in the original Star Trek series, and in doing this, both plays to your expectations, and turns your expectations upside down. Towards the end of the movie, as the stakes, and sacrifices, continue to mount and grow, Abrams delivers something that is both a callback AND a twist, something that isn't easy to pull off without backlash. In addition, Into Darkness has a far more involved and focused villain compared to Nero in Star Trek 09. However, I felt the last few minutes of the movie were a bit rushed, and despite having a great climax, it wrapped up a bit too quickly for my tastes. Acting The entire cast of Star Trek 09 returns, and everyone does a perfectly good job in their roles. Sadly, asides from Kirk, Spock (Zachary Quinto), and Scotty (Simon Pegg), most of the characters tend to just be faces in the background, so if you're looking for everyonee to be pulling equal weight in Into Darkness, you'll probably be disappointed. Kirk and Spock, however, both shine once again here, with Chris Pine doing amazing in both an entertaining and dramatic sense, and Zachary Quinto once again playing the half-human half-vulcan who's torn between his own heritage with expert skill. Newcomer Alice Eve does a solid job as well, but like many of the others, she tends to be swept into the background. The notable newcomer in the bunch is Benedict Cumberbatch playing John Harrison. Now, this is the first time I've seen Cumberbatch in a role, and I know he has a huge following, so I want to clear that up so you don't accuse me of just being a fanboy or something. But man, does he kill it in this role. Cumberbatch is easily the highlight of the movie, simultaneously pulling off being cold, emotionless, intelligent, sympathetic, and downright savage, all at the same time. I know that his role in Sherlock has gotten him popularity, but hopefully with this more mainstream movie, he'll be getting more attention and more roles. Presentation Michael Giacchino returns to do the score for Into Darkness, and he does a damn good job at it. The soundtrack here is absolutely great, and perfectly suits everything happening in the movie, so there's absolutely no complaints on that front. In terms of visuals, the visuals are great. The CG is nothing mind blowing to be sure, but it's absolutely solid still. And on a side note, it's nice to see some alien races played with practical effects and makeup, rather than be CG creatures. Verdict So in the end, I thought Star Trek Into Darkness was: Great!! This movie was close to getting an Awesome rating. The cast does a great job in their roles, everything in th story front is improved over Star Trek 09, the action is better, Cumberbatch does fantastic as the villain, and the score is absolutely great. However, the fact that some characters get swept into the background, and the ending wrapping up a bit too quickly both just barely hold it back. Don't let that fool you though; I loved this movie, and if you're a fan of sci-fi or the 2009 Star Trek, you should absolutely check this out. So, have you seen Star Trek Into Darkness? What did you think? Was I too harsh or too lenient? Did I miss anything? Let me know. baylaust out.

Source This is going to take a while.

I need help accessing the files online. Like u can scroll down the text on screen? To read the text files on the characters that come up

Hey everyone, how's it going? I hope you've all had a wonderful day! Now then, I'm here to offer up my review of the recent Marvel blockbuster Iron Man 3, and don't worry, I'll try to avoid the spoilers as much as possible. Now then, as you all know, Iron Man 3 stars Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark, who's experiencing increasingly exhausting stress and tension after the events occurred in New York. (a.k.a The Avengers movie.) He's tried to forget about that experience, but it haunts him, and so he's not able to sleep, and he spends his days and nights crafting more suits, to keep himself busy. Then The Mandarin, a criminal terrorist, makes public threat broadcasts to evoke fear to everyone who watches, and Tony spurs into action. I loved this movie, because comparing it to the first two Iron Man films, Iron Man 3 is much more darker in terms of story, as it's more personal and focuses more on Tony's psyche, and the constant battles with his own "demons" as he says in the movie. The movie has its funny moments, as is expected of a Marvel movie, showcasing Tony's personality perfectly, and the relationship between Tony and Pepper is touching and bittersweet. And believe me when I say The Mandarin is a surprising, underline SURPRISING villain. I especially loved the special effects when it came to the suits, oh, and for those who love to stick around during the credits, there is indeed something in the end, I won't say what it is, but I found it funny, and there's also an interesting sentence at the very end that kind of raises the question of maybe perhaps another Iron Man movie. Well then, that's my review, and I strongly recommend to all Marvel fans, or superhero fans in general, to watch this superb film.

I'm pretty sure there are people here who have never seen at least a classic movie from Disney. In my case, I've never seen Beauty and the Beast. My cousin did have the tape of the movie, but he lost it a long time ago, and while he had it, I've never seen the movie. So which classic Disney movie haven't you seen?

Hey everyone, how's it going? I just want to talk about one of my favorite movie franchises, which is the Shrek series from Dreamworks Animation. I love those movies to death, as they are very unique in presentation and story, and I love the concept of mashing up numerous fairy tales under one singular package. The movies offer inspiring messages about how to accept yourself for who you are, and that love comes in many forms. This movie series is what made Dreamworks Animation famous, and paved the way for all the other Dreamworks cartoon movies we know today. Now, when it comes to the ones I like, I love all of them, but my two most favorites are Shrek and Shrek 2. The first one, obviously, because it started it all, and I found Farquad to be an amusing and funny villain, and the second installment has such comedic charm and heart to it, that I always tend to watch Shrek 2 the most out of the 4 films. I especially love Puss in Boots in that movie, just hilarious! So then everyone, what is your favorite installment of the Shrek series?

Newest Bit Of Info (Costume Reveal): http://www.nerdist.com/2013/04/jamie-foxxs-amazing-spider-man-2-electro-costume-revealed/ Oh boy. If there's one thing I know about comic book fans, movies based on adaptions on them can be very polarizing. This movie, a sequel to last year's The Amazing Spider Man, isn't even close to being out yet, and now even the confirmed cast list is pissing people off. So, here's the basic arugment: Jamie Foxx, an actor known from recent works like Django Unchained and the upcoming White House Down, is cast as the villian Maxwell Dillion, better known as Electro, one of the most prominent bad guys in the Spider Man rouges gallery. Now, since this is a movie based on a comic book character, not everything is going to be straight from the mind of the person who created the orginal storylines of the comic book itself. That much can be said from Foxx's portrayal in this movie. First off, Jamie Foxx is African American, which already sets a big standard, at least to comic book elitists, considering Max Dillion has always been white in the comics and in pretty much every other adaption of Spider Man until now. There alot of people whining that this is going to throw off the character and ruin his personality and all this. If you ask me, it's just like the King Of Pop said: "It don't matter if you're black or white". We've seen this kind of thing happen before: Micheal Clarke Duncan (RIP) was cast as the Kingpin in the Daredevil movie. I won't say that movie was five star, but I still think Kingpin gave a good performance overall. And, of course, everybody knows that Samuel L. Jackson plays Nick Fury in the Marvel movies. This is actually the Ultimate incarnation of the character, so both comic book fans and casuals alike can rest easy, the comic fans being because the character stays pretty much the same in all his roles and adaptions, and the casuals because... well, it's Samuel L. f**king Jackson, people. Nuff said. All in all, it shouldn't matter whether or not the character being adapted changes his race, his hair color, his eye color, or whatever. As long as the tone and characterization of the original is still there, we should be just fine. There's a difference between favoring the source material and being flat out racist. Second, the look of Jamie Foxx's portrayal is being put into question: he wears all black clothes, with a hoodie over his head, and has sickly blue skin. Some people are even comparing this look to Darth Sidious, all of people. And, yes, some people are also making more jokes about it, mostly because they think the design is God-awful and they think that Foxx looks like a blue zombie or something. My take: this is actually staying close to the comics, believe it or not. The look that Foxx is sporting obviously isn't the cheesy green and yellow look most of us think of when we think Electro. BUT, it IS what he looks like in the Ultimate series for the Spider Man comics. This is because of the direction that Marc Webb, the director of the blooming ASM franchise, which is a more "modern, futuristic" look. This is actually a good reason, because the Ultimate incarnations of Spider Man and the other comic book series strive to do just that; take the formula presented in each series, including characters, themes, and such, and take it to a more modern setting. I actually think Foxx looks even more badass than he did in Django Unchained. And again, we haven't even seen the movie yet, so maybe we should leave this type of thing to judge after we all see the film and every plays out. So, that's my two cents. How about yours?

Yep. That's right. I'm back, bitches. Although I'm not particularily active on the site anymore, I did genuinely miss doing reviews, as talking about movies is something I truly enjoy doing. So, I figured, what better movie to get back into doing reviews for, than the much anticipated Iron Man 3? This movie has the job of following up last year's brilliant Avengers, as well as kicking off Marvel's Phase 2, so a lot rides on this. This movie has it all: action, humour, superheroes, and something I've never seen in a movie before: a henchman who knows when to stop fighting and just go home before he gets blasted. But can it stand up to the hype, and critisism, it's recieved? Here's my review. Keep in mind that this is MY review. Your opinion may very well differ from mine. Story The movie follows Tony Stark, who has been struggling to move on from the events of The Avengers. Gods, aliens, and a near death experience have left Tony with severe Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and he spends all of his time building countless Iron Man suits, preparing for the worst. The worst comes when something called EXTREMIS, a "missing link" in human evolution that gives people incredible powers, is used to power terrorists, led by the mysterious Mandarin. When an attack from The Mandarin's forces brings Tony's world to a grinding halt and leaves him with absolutely nothing, Tony must fight and build his way back from the ashes to become Iron Man once more, get revenge, and protect what very little he has left to lose. This was a very interesting route for the Iron Man movies to take, and I found that for the most part, it worked. This is a very different Tony Stark from the one we've seen in the past; he's been deeply affected by the events of The Avengers, and his whole life revolves around keeping the people closest to him safe. Tony Stark grows far more here than he did over the course of Iron Man 2, and even The Avengers. With that being said, while the movie was definitely going for a more mature, dark, personal tone, I felt there were times where the humour could have been toned down. Now, don't get me wrong, I love humour, especially Marvel / Iron Man humour, but there were times in this movie where I felt that even Stark wouldn't be making quips at certain times. The series is more or less brought back to its roots in this movie. While Iron Man 2 was made to set up for The Avengers, and as a result became too crammed and silly, this is a more independent story, and it really does work. If you want a clearer sense of what the next Avengers will hold, you'll be disappointed, but if you just want a good story about Iron Man, you'll be right at home here. The movie also excels where the other two Iron Man movies have been pretty weak: action. While there isn't a ton of it, the action scenes here are far superior to the other two movies, and it all builds up to a climax that, unlike every Marvel movie other than Avengers, ISN'T a disappointment. Now, I feel I have to discuss this. At the beginning of the final act of the movie, there is a major plot twist regarding The Mandarin, which I won't spoil. This has had a lot of fans absolutely PISSED. Having seen the movie, I can definitely understand why fans of the comics would be outraged over it, and if that's your mindset walking into this movie, this twist will ruin the movie for you most likely. Having said that, I'm reviewing a movie, not an adaptation of a comic book, and in the context of the movie, it worked. Given all the buildup, the Mandarin was a missed opportunity, but something I could get over. I'll just leave it at that. Acting As per usual, Robert Downey Jr. absolutely kills it as Tony Stark, bringing heart and power into the role that many people felt has been missing from Iron Man 2. It's still unknown if Downey will be returning to play Iron Man again or not, as his contract expired with this movie. I'd love to see him play Stark forever, but if this is his last role as Iron Man, he left on a damn good note. The returning regulars, including Don Cheadle, Gwyneth Paltrow, and a surprise cameo after the credits, all do a great job as well. The new cast, for the most part, do a great job as well. Guy Pearce brings a lot of charisma and passion into his role as Aldrich Killian, business rival and personal antagonist to Stark, who is somehow connected to the rise of EXTREMIS. Sir Ben Kingsley is menacing and intimidating in his performance as The Mandarin, creating the idea that this terrorist, while just one man, is someone who could bring the entire western world to its knees at the blink of an eye. Rebeca Hall's role in the movie, however, felt rather unnecessary and wasted. Presentation The Iron Man movies have always been visual marvels (pun intended), and Iron Man 3 doesn't make an exception. While it doesn't have the same scope as The Avengers, it's definitely the best looking of all the Iron Man movies, especially the visually astounding climax, and the use of a suit that can assemble itself piece by piece. Soundtrackwise, this is a far more mature score, for what is generally a far more mature movie. For the first time, I can't recall hearing an AC/DC song. Verdict So when all's said and done, I thought Iron Man 3 was: Great!! Much like Iron Man himself, Iron Man 3 has been upgraded in many ways from its predecessors: it's got all the amazing acting, all the heart, all the top notch presentation, and improved action from the previous movies. That being said, the villain was a missed opportunity with what is a polarizing twist, the tone is a bit confusing at times, and some performances were wasted. It doesn't reach the heights of The Avengers by any means, but it's without a doubt superior to Iron Man 2. If it's as good as the first, is a whole other debate in itself. What I can say is that, while it has its flaws, Marvel's Phase 2 is off to a great start. So, have you seen Iron Man 3? What did you think of it? Was I too harsh or too leniant? Did I miss anything? Let me know. baylaust out.

So as we all know it's really quite common in RL for all the big and strong to oppress the weak and small and, unfortunately it usually seems like they're winning.Well I noticed that same thing happens in Transformers. All the giant buffed up ones are Decepticons and we see the Autobots are so tiny, except for Optimus, who stands up for the weak.So I'm wondering if this was done on purpose.Also, on a side note, whether or not it was on purpose I gotta say that this is one of the reasons Optimus Prime is one of the most respectable fictional characters ever and certainly a role model to me c:

You know something everyone, I've seen a lot of Batman movies over the years, and I've heard the many different voices of the Joker, but you know, when it comes down to it, only two people, I think, in my opinion, have given out the most creepiest and the most incredible performances as Batman's nemesis. And those two people are Heath Ledger, who played his role as The Joker in The Dark Knight movie. His performance was truly outstanding, and the deranged madness of the Joker was perfectly displayed, and I truly feared the Joker when I saw The Dark Knight. Another performance that is worth noting,(it's not from a movie, rather, it's from a video game.) is Mark Hamill's performance as The Joker in the Arkham Batman games. He nailed the personality of the character, and it was a thrill to listen to. I truly salute these two people for their exceptional work on playing The Joker. What do you people think of these two awesome actors?

Marvel fans have plenty to look forward to over the next couple of years, with Thor: The Dark World,Captain America: The Winter Soldier and Guardians of the Galaxy building to the release of The Avengers 2 in 2015. However, with Iron Man 3 getting Phase Two of the MCU off to a billion dollar start, Marvel Studios is wasting little time in formulating its plans for a third cycle of movies. So far, all we know for certain is that Edgar Wright's long-awaited Ant-Man will kick-off things off in 2015, but speaking to Entertainment Weekly, Marvel's President of Production and super producer extraordinaire Kevin Feige has offered a few new comments on several potential projects, including... deep breath... Doctor Strange, Iron Man 4, Inhumans, Runaways, Daredevil, The Punisher, Blade, Ghost Rider and even Marvel Zombies! Here's what he had to say: On Doctor Strange: "I would love Strange to be a part of [Phase Three], only because he’s a great character. He’s a great standalone character. He’s got a great origin story, for the most part. And that world of pure magic, we haven’t done yet. There’s a whole supernatural/magic alternate dimension going on in the Marvel comics that we haven’t ever touched on. So I think that’s exciting [and] I think there’s any number of actors who would be chomping at the bit to play this guy." On Iron Man 4: "I believe there will be a fourthIron Man film and a fifth and a sixth and a 10th and a 20th. I see no reason why Tony Stark can’t be as evergreen as James Bond. Or Batman for that matter. Or Spider-Man. I think Iron Man is a character just like that." On Daredevil, The Punisher, Ghost Rider and Blade: "All those characters are back. They all have potential, but I think we need to find the right time. We’re not going to say, we got it back — make it." On Inhumans: "Inhumans is cool, they’re really great characters. The most powerful guy is the king who doesn’t say a word and if he does — lookout. That’s awesome. And the notion of the Terrigen Mists, this notion that you go through and don’t know what you’re going to be on the other side, is incredibly compelling dramatically... All the craziness that comes with Inhumans, we’ve done in the other movies already. But this would have some of the social drama that we haven’t really done yet. [Fox’s] X-Men, obviously, has been touching on that stuff for a while." On Runaways: "It’s a matter of where it fits. The way the business is working now, you either have really inexpensive, sort of surprise movies that can come out and be hits, but don’t cost much. Or you have the big giant summer blockbusters that really swing for the fences. Right now, we’re just swinging for the fences every time. Runawayssort of falls in between those, in a way. We just haven’t found where or how to do it… right now." And finally, on a potential Marvel Zombiesadaptation: "I know… Zombies is such a funny thing because its such a cool comic and it’s such a cool idea, but the bigger profile becomes what starts to happen [with fans]. Are you going to draw figures in chalk with your 3-year-old with Hulk eating someone? Or Captain America with his brains coming out of the top of his head? Probably not..." Of course, Marvel does have several other potential Phase Three properties at its disposal, and the full article covers some other possibilities, including the long-rumoured Black Panther movie and anotherIncredible Hulk feature, so be sure to head on over to EW to check it out. source http://www.flickeringmyth.com/2013/05/marvels-kevin-feige-talks-doctor.html

I am surprised to see that there are no topics for this. It's pretty old news... old old news. Anyways, there's this Opera in delevopment of Kafei's point of view, and Link doesn't visit Termina. This is a quote from the official website. NOTE: THIS IS NOT SUPPORTED BY NINTENDO...YET. (Source: http://majoraopera.wordpress.com/ ) Anyways, I've been following this for a LONG time, since March last year or the year before, I forget. There have been several demo's, each having some pros and cons. Here are all 6 (so far): Mayor Council Room Fugato: Sakon's Arietta: Pamela's Arietta: Deku Palace Chior: Anju, her mom, and their Johnson the post man. And lastly, Giant's Aria: Feel free to learn more from the website. I think it looks okay. Sometimes, great. Definitely interesting. What do you think about it? (Also, sorry if I posted this in the wrong area. I put it in media under film as you didn't have a play section. I thought about putting this under video games, but I wasn't sure. Feel free to move it.)

for those who dont know, there is a rumor that David tennant (Doctor who) is in talks to play Rocket Raccoon in Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy, i hope this is true, because then we would have two doctors in the marvel cinematic universe, Christopher eccleston, and David tennant.

Did you like "The Avengers"? Well now, there will be a sequel coming out May 1st, 2015! Joss Whedon has commented positively about it. http://www.nme.com/filmandtv/news/joss-whedon-on-the-avengers-2-i-think-its-in-really/306642

Well, I had no idea M. Night Shama Llama Sama Kun was directing this movie... That sucks. It really does. I didn't even see the trailers for the Mandarin until recently, but I can tell you, that is one of the sole reasons I want to see this movie now... though regarding the, uh... little diddy that transpired... I may be having second thoughts. Somehow, I kinda feel the same way about how the Dark Knight Rises ended. That's actually spot on to what's going on in this movie... why do I have the feeling that this is going to be a trend? -_- I hope not.

We've covered Star Wars in KH way too many numerous times in the forum as well as Disney and the Star wars video games. But what about the actual movies? What do you think about the next trilogy? Will it be good or bad? Will Disney ruin Star Wars for you entirely? For a reminder, Star Wars VII-IX are confirmed.

Man of Steel, it's all youuu

On the CoS DVD there is supposedly a secret deleted scene: Disc 2 - Wait until you get to the chamber - Go to the third stop - Hit down - During the info about basilisks type "rooster" hit pause. (only works on computer) unpause - Go to statue of slytherin, into mouth - When you see the basalisk, hit pause - Type "fawkes" - Unpause and fawkes will fly in and kill the basalisk - The narrator will say "you've won the chamber challenge! and you will see a deleted scene, then you go back to the 'activities" scroll Just wondering if this is true and if so could someone You Tube it ( I don't think my computer works for something like this)

- Flash - Black Panther - The Sub-Mariner - Justice League - Red Son

Hey everyone, how's it going? I hope your all doing okay! You know something, I've always loved watching movies, ever since I was little. I obviously started out watching cartoon movies, but then I also moved over to more mature movies, and I've seen my fair share during the years. I have to say that some of the best movies that have been made are from the year 2004 or yesteryear eras. Take Gladiator for example. The movie stars Russel Crowe, and it is masterfully written and has epic and emotional moments, and it's one of the movies that got me into watching movies of that style. Another movie I've always liked is I, Robot, which stars Will Smith. It's one of my favorite movies by him, and I think he does his best role as Spooner. I really liked how the movie questioned the use of technology and if it would be our greatest triumph or greatest downfall. And I loved The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy, as it was what introduced me to the books. The movies were amazing, and are some of my favorites to this day. I also love the Pixar movies like The Incredibles, Toy Story, etc. Long story short, movies are a great storytelling media. (Although Anime and Video Games deliver such frickin exciting thrills.) And I've noticed that during these past 2 years there haven't been that much big theatrical releases, and most of the movies are 3D re-releases of old ones. But there were excellent movies such as The Avengers, Transformers 3, The Hobbit and others. But this year I've seen the wealth of epic movies that are coming out, and I'm starting to think that this might be one epic year for movies. Superman, Wolverine, Despicable Me 2, Epic, Iron Man 3, Monsters University, and so many other movies out there this year will definitely keep me entertained. So everyone, what are you think are some of the best movies ever made?