i have a question on this story.....how the elder wand chose harry as its master?can somebody tell me?

Well, Dumbledore had it. Then Draco disarmed him before Snape killed him, earning Draco the wand. Then when Harry took Draco's wand from him, Harry also got the Elder Wand. They explain it in the book, but not the movie.

Easy. Draco after Dumbledore died became the Master of the Elder wand. Then however if you remember the part in which Harry blasts Draco's wand out of his hand. Because of this and Draco being defeated Harry became the Master of the Elder wand. Got it?

you post this on a KH website.

Here-

Before Dumbledore was killed, Draco Malfoy disarmed him of his wand while later, Snape killed him. Voldemort thought Snape would be the master since he killed Dumbledore- but Draco was the one to disarm him, so he was, unknowingly, the master of the Elder Wand. Then in the skirmish at Malfoy Manor, Harry disarmed Draco and became the master.

no the elder wand works differently than most powerful weapons that choose their masters. If the owner of the wand gets killed, the killer is then the owner of the wand. So when harry killed Draco, the wand became his.

you post this on a KH website.

 

Just because it's a KH site doesn't mean we can't talk about anything else.

 

no the elder wand works differently than most powerful weapons that choose their masters. If the owner of the wand gets killed, the killer is then the owner of the wand. So when harry killed Draco, the wand became his.

 

Harry didn't kill Draco, he disarmed him. And it's not killing that earns you the wand, just besting it's owner, it's just they usually result in death, but there's also disarming.

Just because it's a KH site doesn't mean we can't talk about anything else.

 

true.

Just because it's a KH site doesn't mean we can't talk about anything else.

 

 

 

Harry didn't kill Draco, he disarmed him. And it's not killing that earns you the wand, just besting it's owner, it's just they usually result in death, but there's also disarming.

 

ur right sorry i haven't seen it in a while

Well, Dumbledore had it. Then Draco disarmed him before Snape killed him, earning Draco the wand. Then when Harry took Draco's wand from him, Harry also got the Elder Wand. They explain it in the book, but not the movie.

 

Actually they do explain it in the movie

Yupp. Everyone's got it right.

 

Dumbledore had the Elder Wand. Draco disarmed Dumbledore before Snape murdered him. Then the little fight outbreak at Malfoy's house left Harry to disarm Draco, thus making him the Elder Wand master.

 

The story gets a little confusing, but the book explains it way better. I love the books so much more than the movies. Was anyone else disappointed in how DH7 ended though? It was so... outplayed. Could've used a new move (between Harry & Voldy)

Not as well though. It's better explained in the Book.

no the elder wand works differently than most powerful weapons that choose their masters. If the owner of the wand gets killed, the killer is then the owner of the wand. So when harry killed Draco, the wand became his.

 

When did Harry kill Draco o.0

He never did, echo was just mistaken.

thanks guys!

Yupp. Everyone's got it right.

 

Dumbledore had the Elder Wand. Draco disarmed Dumbledore before Snape murdered him. Then the little fight outbreak at Malfoy's house left Harry to disarm Draco, thus making him the Elder Wand master.

 

The story gets a little confusing, but the book explains it way better. I love the books so much more than the movies. Was anyone else disappointed in how DH7 ended though? It was so... outplayed. Could've used a new move (between Harry & Voldy)

 

My greatest regret from that movie is that we don't see Harry taunting Voldermort. "Try for some remorse. It's the only chance you've got," or whatever the quote is. Hahaha.

 

Anyway, I was also annoyed that they don't explain how Harry came back to life.

 

And I didn't think Lavender died in the book. Did they replace her for Collin or something? You know, because Collin died in the book. But since we hadn't seen him since CoS in the movies, they didn't have him in the last one.

 

And Lupin and Tonks deserved so much more spotlight. SADDEST LOVE STORY EVER.

 

And I wish we would have seen more of the better side of James. And movie goers are going to be like, "Why didn't Lily choose Severus?" because they cut the scene where Severus called her a Mudblood in The Order of the Pheonix.

 

Books are better. But I still like the movies. But I especially wish they explained things better in TPoA and had more of Tom Riddle's past in TH-BP. But they're still good.

 

My greatest regret from that movie is that we don't see Harry taunting Voldermort. "Try for some remorse. It's the only chance you've got," or whatever the quote is. Hahaha.

 

Anyway, I was also annoyed that they don't explain how Harry came back to life.

 

And I didn't think Lavender died in the book. Did they replace her for Collin or something? You know, because Collin died in the book. But since we hadn't seen him since CoS in the movies, they didn't have him in the last one.

 

And Lupin and Tonks deserved so much more spotlight. SADDEST LOVE STORY EVER.

 

And I wish we would have seen more of the better side of James. And movie goers are going to be like, "Why didn't Lily choose Severus?" because they cut the scene where Severus called her a Mudblood in The Order of the Pheonix.

 

Books are better. But I still like the movies. But I especially wish they explained things better in TPoA and had more of Tom Riddle's past in TH-BP. But they're still good.

 

I agree. I also wish they would've put Fred's death in there. All you saw was him lying on the floor and the family crying. They gave Fred, Tonks & Lupin absolutely no spotlight or justice. I thought that was horrible.

 

And yeah, well, personally I didn't like James. I was Team Sev from the beginning lol But they definitely could've put in James better scenes.

 

I also wish they would've showed more of Voldemort's story. Like, his mother's scene and everything and how he killed his father. Those were a huge part to the story and they didn't show them. Like really??

 

I'm also mad they didn't put the big school fight in HBP. I was looking forward to that and all they showed was Bellatrix walking on the tables, smashes glasses.

 

The movies did the books no justice at all, but I still like them. If I didn't read the books though, I'd be confused because so much was left out. Everyone I know who didn't ead the book thought Severus was Harry's real Dad and Lily cheated on James or something LOL That's how bad nothing was explained. It went by too fast so a lot of people didn't get it.

 

I agree. I also wish they would've put Fred's death in there. All you saw was him lying on the floor and the family crying. They gave Fred, Tonks & Lupin absolutely no spotlight or justice. I thought that was horrible.

 

And yeah, well, personally I didn't like James. I was Team Sev from the beginning lol But they definitely could've put in James better scenes.

 

I also wish they would've showed more of Voldemort's story. Like, his mother's scene and everything and how he killed his father. Those were a huge part to the story and they didn't show them. Like really??

 

I'm also mad they didn't put the big school fight in HBP. I was looking forward to that and all they showed was Bellatrix walking on the tables, smashes glasses.

 

The movies did the books no justice at all, but I still like them. If I didn't read the books though, I'd be confused because so much was left out. Everyone I know who didn't ead the book thought Severus was Harry's real Dad and Lily cheated on James or something LOL That's how bad nothing was explained. It went by too fast so a lot of people didn't get it.

 

The Lupin/Tonks will forever sadden me. We didn't get to see any of their beautiful love story on the big screen. And Bill/Fleur was supposed to happen a lot earlier, too (not the wedding, but seeing them together).

 

And I'm sad we never met Charlie in the movies. And they never explain why Percy is siding with the ministry in OtP, and why he's suddenly with his family again in DH part 2.

 

It's ridiculous that they didn't show more of the Voldermort scenes. I liked the idea that in order to defeat him, Harry had to understand him. And it showed a lot of their similarities. Also, it gave Harry a good idea of where the horcruxes were. In the movie version it's a miracle they found one because they didn't know anything! It really looked like Dumbledore hadn't helped Harry at all.

 

LOL. I loved that fight scene! The Order was supposed to be there, and that was when Bill got his face all scratched up by Greyback. I love how Fleur promises she'll stay with Bill no matter what, and Tonks rounds on Lupin and is pretty much like, "If the wereolf thing doesn't matter to Fleur, why do you think it would to me?" LOL.

 

Wow. I've never heard anyone theorize that. LOL. But yeah, the movies should have explained things better or sooner. Like how the trace worked, and why Harry had to stay at the Dursleys for so long. And you know, the movies make it seem like Harry and Ron don't really know any spells or ideas. The jumping on the dragon to escape Gringotts was Harry's idea. Not Hermione's.

 

But yeah, even though the movies are flawed, I still love them. They're probably (sadly) one of the best book to screen adaptations. Lord knows they're truer than Twilight. And it's seeming like The Hunger Games isn't going to be accurate, either.

 

Actually, that's another thing that bothers me. Lately, it seems like Hollywood is ruining the "true" couples. Like there was more Harry/Hermione in the movies when there should have been more Ron/Hermione. There was no Harry/Ginny (I don't even think Ginny had the same personality as book Ginny).

 

In the Twilight movies, they ruined the first one. And so everyone hates Edward, and everyone ships Jacob/Bella.

 

In The Hunger Games, they're adding Gale/Katniss to the first one when there wasn't any. At all.

 

And by doing this, they're ruining your chance to have the time to explore each pairing. Twilight was Edward/Bella. New Moon was Jacob/Bella, but since they messed up Twilight, they ruined the Edward/Bella relationship.

 

And it'll probably happen with The Hunger Games, too. Since that one was Peeta/Katniss, and Catching Fire was the Gale/Katniss book. They're probably going to make more people ship Gale/Katniss. It's freaking annoying!

 

As an avid reader, I wish they'd be more accurate with the books and pairings. It's Ron/Hermione, Harry/Ginny, Edward/Bella, Peeta/Katniss. But do the movies do it that way? No.

 

Ugh. Rant over.

 

All I can hope is that at least City of Bones (the first of The Mortal Instruments book series) will be accurate with Jace/Clary! And The Host, The Wolves of Mercy Falls Series, and Maximum Ride Series should be accurate when they get around to making those, too.