Japanese Famitsu Magazine has already reviewed Kingdom Hearts Re: Coded (Nintendo DS), giving the game a 36/40. For those that do not know, Famitsu magazine has four individuals review each game out of a score of ten, and adds them all together to make a total score of forty. This would give Re: Coded an average score of a 9/10.

 

KHinsider will upload the scan and details

 

Source: http://www.khinsider.com

YAY good scoreee

BETTER THEN BBS?

how, i thought it was gunna be shyt.

im still gunna play it

NICE!!!

thats wat i thought the score was for days and nnow its boring i guess recoded must be better

They really like the score 36/40.

Nice... that's a good score

Famitsu is garage at reviwing.every game they gave 40 out of 40 dosn't dersive it.they give every thing square enix at least 34 it seems.So i don't really care about this review at all

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (this is only one that should have perect mark here and maybe soulcaider)

Soulcalibur (it's not perect)

Vagrant Story (i havdn't pllay this)

The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker (no)

Nintendogs (really???)

Final Fantasy XII (it's good)

Super Smash Bros. Brawl(it's great but not perect)

Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots (it's not even best mgs game of is this 40 and mgs1,2,3 arn't)

Dragon Quest IX: Sentinels of the Starry Skies (really?)

Monster Hunter Tri (ya it's good game)

Bayonetta (not perect)

New Super Mario Bros. Wii (really? i mean really,it like mario but come on)

Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker(great game not perect by any means)

All reviews are only opinions that lots of people subscribe to. Your opinions are different than Famtsus, but that doesn't degrade their ability to review.

Oh, and BTW, a 40/40 isn't 'perfect' it's Famtsus highest recommendation. That's what a lot of people need to understand, scores are measures of quality, but the reviewers recommendation.

but come on they have srcew up so many reviews and to me and other reviews they review to high they also couldn't play demon souls's because it was to hard for them because it wasn't made by sqaure enix

but come on they have srcew up so many reviews and to me and other reviews they review to high they also couldn't play demon souls's because it was to hard for them because it wasn't made by sqaure enix

 

Could you rephrase that? I didn't understand that at all.

I think what he's saying is they're rather biased when it comes to reviews, and that he doesn't trust their reviews. That's how I read it anyway.

 

36/40 is a good score, glad to hear that Famisu liked it.

the score is higher then average.And then a rpg like Demon soul's came out that known as one of toughtest games in last 10 years and the hated properly because they could not beat it.For reason there in love with square enix games which is kinda sad but really they gave 36 out 40 to days which i would give 6.5.They gave NA games lower score then there games

I don't see how being the most difficult game in 10 years is a positive.

Especially since it's an RPG, where difficulty is more of a 'Let's give this thing high power and attack rate' than actual skill.

i know but that's what they said was wrong with it for being to hard it did have thing you stated and won goty from gamespot and alot other nominee it and called it best rpg of the year

So people have different opinions on a game, is that what you're getting at?

I don't like halo, but it's ridiculously popular, so I assume there's something about that everybody else likes so much. It's the same deal here, the person who happened to review the game didn't like it.

That's all.

but they do this with alot games anyway that's it they are good at getting news and giving some idea about a game