The capital of California should be LA. Honestly Sacramento isn't as much Business, population, or awesomeness as LA. No comparison at all between them because Sacramento sucks. Sacramento needs to be about 20% cooler and maybe it could pass for Capital of Cali! What do you all think?

Edited June 1, 201213 yr by Libirica

And I want to be the President of the United States, but we clearly know that's not happening.

And I want to be the President of the United States, but we clearly know that's not happening.

 

exactly

Cali?

 

The member?

I vote no. Captials are not always based on "business, population, or awesomeness."

My home state is Delaware. Our capital is Dover. But our most populated city and city with the most business is Wilmington.

Then there's New York, capital: Albany. But New York City is much more populated and has more business (and is probably considered "more awesome").

And there's Pennsylvannia, capital: Harrisburg. But Philadelphia has more historical significance and is generally more well-known.

Edited June 1, 201213 yr by Xenidal

Put the capital where there is more wealthy people to make it easier to buy off politicians in power? No thanks. I live in Illinois, and the capital is Springfield; not Chicago. It's better off that way (Chicago is corrupt as hell).

who cares? politics still sucks

I see no logical reason to change it .

Edited June 1, 201213 yr by Flaming Lea

Disregard all of the history and reasons why it became the capital and make another city a capital?

Who cares about California? It's just a tourist trap and where all the hippies and morons co-exist peacefully.

Who cares about California? It's just a tourist trap and where all the hippies and morons co-exist peacefully.

 

Pshh California's awesome >:I