[These are] the sort of people who, for example, might want to watch a movie. They might want to go to Disneyland. Their attitude is, 'okay, I am the customer. You are supposed to entertain me.' It's kind of a passive attitude they're taking, and to me it's kind of a pathetic thing. They do not know how interesting it is if you move one step further and try to challenge yourself [with more advanced games].

 

Fortunately, because of the spread of smart devices, people take games for granted now. It's a good thing for us, because we do not have to worry about making games something that are relevant to general people's daily lives.

-Shigeru Miyamoto

This is from a recent interview with Edge Magazine.  Basically, Miyamoto isn't a fan of the Casual Gaming Market and would much rather stick to Core Gamers in where he can make less games that are the equivalent of a lousy smartphone game. 

 

Source: http://www.gamnesia.com/news/miyamoto-nintendo-is-focused-on-core-gamers-not-passive-ones#.U_4Ya8EpDQ8

It seems like you are changing your story now. You said that "I just don't want to play the same thing for twenty plus years, sans a few changes here and there..." [sic] and now you're saying you're not asking for innovation at all. Odd.And anyway, most of the games he has produced are fairly dificult, they follow a style, but they're still dificult.

 

Here, let me make this simple so you and that sombrero can understand: Miyamoto needs to make his games harder. He's been doing the same thing, for the most part, with Mario and/or other series for quite some time. I'm not asking him to reinvent the wheel with every Mario game, just not to reuse the 2D or 3D formula every other game. Better?

Here, let me make this simple so you and that sombrero can understand: Miyamoto needs to make his games harder. He's been doing the same thing, for the most part, with Mario and/or other series for quite some time. I'm not asking him to reinvent the wheel with every Mario game, just not to reuse the 2D or 3D formula every other game. Better?

And as I'very said, the games he develops are already pretty hard on their own and don't need an up in dificulty. Maybe thst got through your fireball brain.

And as I'very said, the games he develops are already pretty hard on their own and don't need an up in dificulty. Maybe thst got through your fireball brain.

 

They're hard for people who think collecting things are hard. Harder means the game challenges you more, not giving you more stuff to unlock or accomplish.

They're hard for people who think collecting things are hard. Harder means the game challenges you more, not giving you more stuff to unlock or accomplish.

Maybe you should actually play the games and see how dificult it is.

Maybe you should actually play the games and see how dificult it is.

 

Play the games to know how hard it is to collect more stuff? I don't think I need to play to know the hardships of that great task.

Play the games to know how hard it is to collect more stuff? I don't think I need to play to know the hardships of that great task.

It's not just collection, you would know that if you played them.

It's not just collection, you would know that if you played them.

 

Okay fine. Collection plus other tasks that don't actually make the game harder but just give you more stuff to do.

Okay fine. Collection plus other tasks that don't actually make the game harder but just give you more stuff to do.

I'd like to bring Super Mario 3D World's postgame (and a few later levels) to the table. Tough as heck.

Okay fine. Collection plus other tasks that don't actually make the game harder but just give you more stuff to do.

-_-I'm done trying to explain this. Not worth my time.