Tyrants

The Black Cauldron didn't do so well with Disney, I highly doubt it.

Oh the imagination of KH fans go wild.

Same here. On the other note if Riku had a son, who would be the mother?

After reading this section of the interview with Nomura: "--By the way, we'll see the end of the Dark Seeker Saga in KH3, but what will happen after that? Nomura: Kingdom Hearts is a Disney title, so I can't speak for them, but naturally, in my own mind I have ideas about what happens after KH3. About characters, and developments. Maybe sometime there will be a chance to talk about that, but rather than thinking out the concrete details regarding that, right now my first priority is completing KH3. I want to put out KH3 quickly." It got me thinking, what will happen after KH3? Will past enemies be allies? Will there be a new generation of heroes? What is brewing up there in Nomura's mind? I hope if it's an awesome idea, Disney would accept it. I have heard of some arguments that have sparked up between Squeenix and Disney and I hope it wasn't a result of great ideas being abandoned.

You'd never know, if they put forth much effort into a new non Final Fantasy game. This is another reason why this industry is slowly failing, companies are too scared to try something new.

Er, don't mean to be rude here, how exactly was this relevant to anything I said? All I said is that they should give Final Fantasy a (long) break. Final Fantasy isn't even the only RPG they have. Also, isn't 15 steering away from turn-based gamplay?

Pfft- they make games aside from RPGs? I would like an update to Secret of Mana (and maybe Chrono Trigger) and I think there were cancellations to new IPs (searches interwebs for name)

For the third main installment to be released before the Duke Nukem Forever effect sets in. Yeah, but there are many other games Square has that they could give attention, but I guess not because money talks. And? More focus on other games, especially the forgotten ones. Nope. Heck, I hold the same opinion for Nintendo games.

Like I said before, if they want to release more stories, they can just make a movie, or TV series, or something. Like I said before, I don't want Square to milk the series like they are doing with Final Fantasy. If it gets to that point then I'll have a problem, but it hasn't. Um, I never said wished the series never existed in the first place, I said it has been going on for too long.

When you have the same gameplay, gimmicks and concepts most of the time, there will be some issue. Yeah, but the time that went into the bad games could have been used to make something better. I want them to focus more on Kingdom Hearts, but I don't want them to milk the series. There is more to a game than just story, if they wanted to release more stories they could have just done what they did FF7 and make a movie.

I agree. I also noticed Square is developing this fetish for Lightning.

I don't see a point to having a different story when the gameplay isn't all that different in most of the games. Hm, coincidence? I think not!

Nah, it's still series. It doesn't have mechanics that are severely different from other most other RPGs.

I think the series has been going on longer than it should. I understand it's Square's cash cow, but I think it is time for them to focus on other games (like Kingdom Hearts and all the other RPGs they never touched in years, hell even a new IP). Final Fantasy is becoming the next Bleach. I mean, it has had it's fun in the beginning, but enough is enough too much is not good. I'll let Final Fantasy 15 fly with this one (I still wish it go away so Kingdom Hearts 3 will come out before I graduate) but after that... ugh.

So where are they gonna get Sora's heartless?

Yush! Maybe in like a Kingdom Hearts version of Dissidia or Days Style Missions.

Of course, but what about Ike, Marth (even if he doesn't speak English), everyone from Star Fox, etc?

As someone who is looking forward to entering the game industry I did my research. Nintendo is struggling, especially with keeping up with other systems Sony... eh I have yet to check up with them. Microsoft- as the makers of Windows they are far from it Valve is actually doing extremely well with letting their community get involved and funding games. Capcom and EA are doing horrible, on the other hand. I think Cecil has a greater chance, I don't know what relationship FF13 had with Nintendo. Actually there are Nintendo characters in SSB that talk. Sonic especially.

??? I'm not sure where you are getting at with seeing dead bodies in playable modes. All I asked for was a dead scene where someone realistically dies. Who is a real person and doesn't come back to life. I'm confused about Eraqus and if he permanently died.

I'm not sure about that. Final Fantasy franchise did originate on Nintendo systems, but the entry FF7 wasn't.

... It did?I hope so, maybe they want to surprise us.

I know it's never gonna happen (...now I can see why every other game company but Valve is failing), but would it be amazing! How would you react if Nintendo, Square and Disney did become less strict and let this happen?

I don't think featuring a real death will harm KH so that really isn't much of a problem. The problem that lies is who would die.

But what I am asking is: Is it strict? Like would they get in trouble if they do something different?

I never said I wanted any blood, I wanted to see a body. Not all bodies need blood, like in the Lion King.