Kingdom Hearts in SSB. Your opinions?

[rizar14 8]

i want like sora and riku and tav in it so bad

Edited August 3, 2011 by KairiSora06
Why would you knowingly put this in the wrong section....? Ask before you make a thread if you're not sure....

[JTD95 1,110]

Why would they been in it?

[sephyfan98 8]

yeah.....and also Riku.....they should put Sephiroth in it, too! hey, did you know that Cloud was originally going to be in Brawl, but he was replaced by Solid Snake......grrrrr.

[Razorwind Keyblade 304]

Just becasue they put Moogle in Mario Hoops 4 on 4 doesn't mean they will put Sora, Riku, and TVA in it.

 

Sora, Riku, Terra, Aqua, Ven, and Roxas are all owned by Disney so that would basiclly be like mixing Nintendo and Disney and putting them in one game.

[P50L 610]

 

 

Just becasue they put Moogle in Mario Hoops 4 on 4 doesn't mean they will put Sora, Riku, and TVA in it.

 

Sora, Riku, Terra, Aqua, Ven, and Roxas are all owned by Disney so that would basiclly be like mixing Nintendo and Disney and putting them in one game.

 

It can be a new Marvel VS Capcom

[Rob 5,571]

Where's the connection between SS Bros. and Square and Disney?

[hatok 6,413]

Where's the connection between SS Bros. and Square and Disney?

 

The same connection there is between Smash Bros and Sega, or Smash Bros and Konami

 

Just becasue they put Moogle in Mario Hoops 4 on 4 doesn't mean they will put Sora, Riku, and TVA in it.

 

Sora, Riku, Terra, Aqua, Ven, and Roxas are all owned by Disney so that would basiclly be like mixing Nintendo and Disney and putting them in one game.

 

The Moogle in Hoops was because Square made the game. It's not like Nintendo asked them to do it.

 

It's not impossible for a KH character (Key word is 'a' there won't be five KH characters) to appear, but a FF character would have priority.

[khforever999 3]

Sora has been in DS games but u know he wasnt even created by nintendo and hes not like a cult classic nintendo character like all the others i say if u want someone to be in smash brothers they have to have been in an NES game i mean there are some exeptions like wario and a few others but the majority of the characters dated back to NES so having sora riku or whoever in a smash brothers game would be like them putting reptile in smash brothers at least he was in a super nintendo game and another thing i dont think sora could last a whole story mode without talking

[rizar14 8]

 

Just becasue they put Moogle in Mario Hoops 4 on 4 doesn't mean they will put Sora, Riku, and TVA in it.

 

Sora, Riku, Terra, Aqua, Ven, and Roxas are all owned by Disney so that would basiclly be like mixing Nintendo and Disney and putting them in one game.

 

 

why ummmmmmm kh have been on alot of notendo system ds 3ds and im sure kh3 will be on wiiu no dout i know it will and it will it will be and have better grapics then ps3 and yeah

[hatok 6,413]

 

 

why ummmmmmm kh have been on alot of notendo system ds 3ds and im sure kh3 will be on wiiu no dout i know it will and it will it will be and have better grapics then ps3 and yeah

 

Final Fantasy has been on Nintendo systems as well, and generates more than 3 times the revenue on average.

And there's no reason to be CERTAIN KH3 will be on the Wii U

[Rob 5,571]

The same connection there is between Smash Bros and Sega, or Smash Bros and Konami.

 

I knew it.

[Razorwind Keyblade 304]

 

 

why ummmmmmm kh have been on alot of notendo system ds 3ds and im sure kh3 will be on wiiu no dout i know it will and it will it will be and have better grapics then ps3 and yeah

 

OK and wha does that have to do with KH being in Super Smash Bros.?

[hatok 6,413]

 

OK and wha does that have to do with KH being in Super Smash Bros.?

 

Basically, if Square has had relations with Nintendo in the past, they might be more motivated to put one of their franchises in Smash Bros.

[Razorwind Keyblade 304]

 

Basically, if Square has had relations with Nintendo in the past, they might be more motivated to put one of their franchises in Smash Bros.

 

I don't know if they would go that far...

[hatok 6,413]

 

I don't know if they would go that far...

 

Go that far to do what? All he's saying is that if Nintendo and Square get along, and Square asks to be in the next Smash Bros, Nintendo is more likely to say yes.

[Razorwind Keyblade 304]

 

Go that far to do what? All he's saying is that if Nintendo and Square get along, and Square asks to be in the next Smash Bros, Nintendo is more likely to say yes.

 

That's not specificlly what he said. I don't see why it would be nessacary for them to put KH in Super Smash Bros. It's not like Sora or Riku are "classic" Nintendo characters. Therefore it wouldn't make sense for them to put KH in SSB. I can see you want Kingdom Hearts in Super Smash Bros.

[hatok 6,413]

 

That's not specificlly what he said. I don't see why it would be nessacary for them to put KH in Super Smash Bros. It's not like Sora or Riku are "classic" Nintendo characters. Therefore it wouldn't make sense for them to put KH in SSB. I can see you want Kingdom Hearts in Super Smash Bros.

 

As a KH fan, of course I want them in. But I know there's no chance.

But a third party character is more likely if they have a connection to Nintendo. FF was Nintendo exclusive for a long while. Sonic is Mario's rival in sales. Metal Gear was on the Gameboy.

[OblivionRider 50]

Honestly, the only characters who remotely have a shot are Sora and Riku/Roxas. Disney probably won't allow it though.

[Draxlon_Nobody 1]

yeah.....and also Riku.....they should put Sephiroth in it, too! hey, did you know that Cloud was originally going to be in Brawl, but he was replaced by Solid Snake......grrrrr.

 

WAT DA FREAK WE NEED MOAR CLOUD

[sephyfan98 8]

 

WAT DA FREAK WE NEED MOAR CLOUD

 

YEAH, WE NEED MORE CLOUD!!!!!!!! (And of course, Sephy too, cause you cant have one without the other....)

[hatok 6,413]

yeah.....and also Riku.....they should put Sephiroth in it, too! hey, did you know that Cloud was originally going to be in Brawl, but he was replaced by Solid Snake......grrrrr.

 

This is... completely untrue. Originally there were going to be no 3rd party characters, but Hideo Kojima personally asked Nintendo to have Snake. Then fans demanded more 3rd party, so they threw in Sonic at the last moment.

[Byronic Hero 5]

I personally believe that out of all the 3rd party characters to put in, Sora has to be at least in the top 5. Plus, since Megaman's pretty much been killed by Capcom, there's lees of a possibility that he'll be in the next Smash.....so

[rizar14 8]

I personally believe that out of all the 3rd party characters to put in, Sora has to be at least in the top 5. Plus, since Megaman's pretty much been killed by Capcom, there's lees of a possibility that he'll be in the next Smash.....so

 

yes like everyone say why umm why'd they put sonic in it why'd they put snake in it cause they wanted to so umm sora could be in it so yeaaaa. i wish they put knuckles in it and roxas or riku or tav one of them. but sora already in it like they add one more you know

[Azure Flame 670]

Actually, I read somewhere that Nintendo had a poll of who to put in Brawl, either Snake or Sora. As for why Sonic is there, Nintendo practically owns Sonic now, due to the rivalry with Mario as well as the Olympic Games games.

[rizar14 8]

Actually, I read somewhere that Nintendo had a poll of who to put in Brawl, either Snake or Sora. As for why Sonic is there, Nintendo practically owns Sonic now, due to the rivalry with Mario as well as the Olympic Games games.

 

in the new one or brawl because i hate snake i dont like anything about him he sucks a sora would of been way better