Posted July 20, 201213 yr http://www.metacritic.com/game/3ds/kingdom-hearts-3d-dream-drop-distance/critic-reviews It got a 76, which is pretty close to 358/2 days which got a 75. Okay for the people who don't know about MetaCritic: MetaCritic is a site where you get all the critics that review for it and they combine and divide it to get the median, which is the score. A lot of the reviews were positive which were 80+ One of them are quite unfair, which gave it a 40. Only one mixed score which gave it a 70. I am not sure if the reviews are done but still, it doesn't look that great for this game.
July 23, 201213 yr Author But bashing a game isn't a good review. A proper review consists of both appreciation AND critiscm, not just one or the other. That's why it's understandable that NO game really can have a 100/100 review. Every good point about the game was followed by at least a few more bad ones. Every paragraph stated negative facts. Why include a review that has been so poorly written? I understand that not everyone is a fan of this game series, but that doesn't mean people who hate the series should write a biased review based on solely their own thoughts. It's as if this person put an image in their mind of KH3D being horrible, then played it, and then regarded it as horrible anyway. This person obviously does have an opinion, but that's an opinion, not a review. n opinion cannot be portrayed as a full, proper review.I'm just saying that this review isn't even a proper review and therefore should not be included. Actually http://www.pushsquar...rakes_deception It got a 100/100 Edited July 23, 201213 yr by Shana09
July 23, 201213 yr But bashing a game isn't a good review. A proper review consists of both appreciation AND critiscm, not just one or the other. That's why it's understandable that NO game really can have a 100/100 review. Every good point about the game was followed by at least a few more bad ones. Every paragraph stated negative facts. Why include a review that has been so poorly written? I understand that not everyone is a fan of this game series, but that doesn't mean people who hate the series should write a biased review based on solely their own thoughts. It's as if this person put an image in their mind of KH3D being horrible, then played it, and then regarded it as horrible anyway. This person obviously does have an opinion, but that's an opinion, not a review. n opinion cannot be portrayed as a full, proper review.I'm just saying that this review isn't even a proper review and therefore should not be included. Criticizing=/=bashing. That's all that needs to be said based on your wall of text. He simply didn't like the game. Why can't you just accept that not everyone will like a game? EDIT: Well, I guess criticism is sort of bashing x3 But my point still stands. Edited July 23, 201213 yr by KissyFace
July 23, 201213 yr Author Criticizing=/=bashing. That's all that needs to be said based on your wall of text. He simply didn't like the game. Why can't you just accept that not everyone will like a game? EDIT: Well, I guess criticism is sort of bashing x3 But my point still stands. I think a review is supposed to be fair, we all know that a 40 is not understandable for this game, also that guy said everything is bad, which isn't and I am not going biased, but it is not bad enough to give it a 40. Atleast a 60+ Edited July 23, 201213 yr by Shana09
July 23, 201213 yr I think a review is supposed to be fair, we all know that a 40 is not understandable for this game, also that guy said everything is bad, which isn't and I am not going biased, but it is not bad enough to give it a 40. Atleast a 60+ To be fair, have you actually played the game yet? Also, he didn't say that everything is bad, but bad review or not, it still should be on this list, not just putting up the good/decent review scores. That being said, his score was overly harsh based on his criticisms.
July 23, 201213 yr "I understand that not everyone is a fan of this game series, but that doesn't mean people who hate the series should write a biased review based on solely their own thoughts." ^in case you skipped this. Like Shana09 said, his review could've scored bad, but as low as 40/100 is absolutely ridiculous. Simply because he personally didn't like the game. Then he shouldve just posted that as an opinion, not a full review if it was only opinion, not actual attempt at observation. To be fair, have you actually played the game yet? Also, he didn't say that everything is bad, but bad review or not, it still should be on this list, not just putting up the good/decent review scores. That being said, his score was overly harsh based on his criticisms. What we're saying is though, is that his review doesn't fulfill requirements of a proper review, as it is merely his own opinion. All he could applause was the graphics, nothing else. He pretty much did say everything is bad. Every paragraph was negatively written with full criticism. For all the good points he stated, he also attempted to support with a few reasons as to why the good point should be knocked over and forgotten.
July 23, 201213 yr "I understand that not everyone is a fan of this game series, but that doesn't mean people who hate the series should write a biased review based on solely their own thoughts." ^in case you skipped this. Like Shana09 said, his review could've scored bad, but as low as 40/100 is absolutely ridiculous. Simply because he personally didn't like the game. Then he shouldve just posted that as an opinion, not a full review if it was only opinion, not actual attempt at observation. What we're saying is though, is that his review doesn't fulfill requirements of a proper review, as it is merely his own opinion. All he could applause was the graphics, nothing else. He pretty much did say everything is bad. Every paragraph was negatively written with full criticism. For all the good points he stated, he also attempted to support with a few reasons as to why the good point should be knocked over and forgotten. It covered story, gameplay, and new features. That basically proves your point invalid. It had more then enough to be considered a proper review. Also, maybe he really didn't like the gameplay? But that aside, the gameplay section really didn't have much criticism, rendering that point invalid as well. Just accept that some will not like a game, even if most people do. EDIT: And the thought that someone should write a review as an opinion because it is negative is completely ridiculous. Expunge that thought from your head right now. Edited July 23, 201213 yr by KissyFace
July 23, 201213 yr It covered story, gameplay, and new features. That basically proves your point invalid. It had more then enough to be considered a proper review. Also, maybe he really didn't like the gameplay? But that aside, the gameplay section really didn't have much criticism, rendering that point invalid as well. Just accept that some will not like a game, even if most people do. EDIT: And the thought that someone should write a review as an opinion because it is negative is completely ridiculous. Expunge that thought from your head right now. Again, I said that I understand that not everyone is a fan of KH, in case you missed that point again. I never said that a negative review couldn't be written, I stated that even with good or bad points, 40/100 is ridiculous. Even just above that could be reasonable, but to say this game is a failure? That's crossing the line. And anyone's opinion could include all different facts of the game such as graphics and gameplay. But a professional reviewer doesn't only criticize a game, and they most certainly don't put games as 40% often. A 50-60 is understandable for someone who really didn't like it. But to have a few good points and accompany that with a 40? No. Just no.
July 23, 201213 yr Again, I said that I understand that not everyone is a fan of KH, in case you missed that point again. I never said that a negative review couldn't be written, I stated that even with good or bad points, 40/100 is ridiculous. Even just above that could be reasonable, but to say this game is a failure? That's crossing the line. And anyone's opinion could include all different facts of the game such as graphics and gameplay. But a professional reviewer doesn't only criticize a game, and they most certainly don't put games as 40% often. A 50-60 is understandable for someone who really didn't like it. But to have a few good points and accompany that with a 40? No. Just no. I don't miss points. My point is not everyone will like a game and rate it high. The fact that you're still arguing with me about it shows me that you're the one missing the point here. The AV Club gave Uncharted 3 a 50%. It's just some people's opinions, whether or you agree or not, and their review should be on the list. LightningXIII, it ends here. Just let it go.
July 23, 201213 yr Author I don't miss points. My point is not everyone will like a game and rate it high. The fact that you're still arguing with me about it shows me that you're the one missing the point here. The AV Club gave Uncharted 3 a 50%. It's just some people's opinions, whether or you agree or not, and their review should be on the list. LightningXIII, it ends here. Just let it go. If you want to argue about the list thing, then do it with DC. He is the one who made it >>
July 23, 201213 yr If you want to argue about the list thing, then do it with DC. He is the one who made it >> I already quoted him, he didn't reply.
July 24, 201213 yr G4 review of KH3D http://www.g4tv.com/games/3ds/64660/kingdom-hearts-3d-dream-drop-distance/review/
July 24, 201213 yr Author G4 review of KH3D http://www.g4tv.com/...istance/review/ Yeah it is included in the MetaCritic thing. It boosted the game score up by one point. It's now a 77.
July 24, 201213 yr Yeah it is included in the MetaCritic thing. It boosted the game score up by one point. It's now a 77. my bad and wow 1 point
July 24, 201213 yr Author my bad and wow 1 point xDDDD I wish it increases into the 80's, that be nice. Even though I haven't played it yet, I think it should be around the same score as BBS.
July 24, 201213 yr xDDDD I wish it increases into the 80's, that be nice. Even though I haven't played it yet, I think it should be around the same score as BBS. yea i saw the score of BBS on the MetaCritic and was like wow KH3D needs to be up here too
July 24, 201213 yr Author yea i saw the score of BBS on the MetaCritic and was like wow KH3D needs to be up here too Only 13 critics reviewed KH3D. BBS got 62 critics. Lets wait for a week after the NA KH3D release for the final average score.
July 24, 201213 yr Told ya. Reviews with near-perfect (but not actually perfect) scores are referred to as Eight Point Eight. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/EightPointEight
July 26, 201213 yr GT Review http://www.gametrailers.com /reviews/odf2m0/kingdom-hearts-3d--dream-drop-distance-review Edited July 26, 201213 yr by Terranort9406
July 27, 201213 yr 0:32 Kingdom Hearts 3.... DS!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Z5p-QXWpY4 Edited July 27, 201213 yr by Terranort9406
http://www.metacritic.com/game/3ds/kingdom-hearts-3d-dream-drop-distance/critic-reviews
It got a 76, which is pretty close to 358/2 days which got a 75.
Okay for the people who don't know about MetaCritic:
MetaCritic is a site where you get all the critics that review for it and they combine and divide it to get the median, which is the score.
A lot of the reviews were positive which were 80+
One of them are quite unfair, which gave it a 40.
Only one mixed score which gave it a 70.
I am not sure if the reviews are done but still, it doesn't look that great for this game.