I've been looking for legitimate reasons why Square hasn't ported 1.5, 2.5, & 2.8 to Xbox One yet & are waiting till after KHIII comes out to come to a decision about it. In my opinion, this is completely asinine, since if III comes to the platform, logically, the previous titles should also. Reasons I keep coming across are as follows:
1. They're focusing on KHIII's development. This is mainly for a Switch port of III, but I feel it could be applied to the HD collections as well to an extent.
2. Nomura doesn't believe there's a lot of support outside of North America (in which case, wouldn't just a region-specific or digital-only release to minimize costs suffice?). It also crosses with people believing sales figures of their games on Xbox also play a role, but if that were true, they'd have just dropped the console family entirely by now, especially since Microsoft helped them produce Rise of the Tomb Raider.
3. An exclusivity deal with Sony for the earlier main games (KHI & II) restricting the platforms that the collections can appear on. I keep hearing this from some news outlets & people online, but my search towards an actual answer has turned up fruitless on whether or not this is actually a true thing.
So, is there actually, in writing, or an interview, or something, that actually says anything legitimate about an exclusivity deal. What makes this less believable for me is the fact that, outside of the main games, the handheld games are all on Nintendo handhelds, minus BBS. Also, the fact that there's been an Xbox One release since its announcement leaves me to believe this isn't really a thing. I, honestly, think this is hearsay drummed up by some fans somewhere years ago trying to justify to themselves why the series is only on Sony systems without actually thinking through their logic hard enough. Not only that, but with III coming to the system, denying Xbox players the collections is bad, not only because they're stories are things you'll need to know for III, but the games can be really fun, especially KHII. Denying Xbox players the opportunity to play the games outside of buying another console that they're probably not interested in is kinda detrimental tot he series. Nomura has also stated it's a possibility to do in the future. So, is this "exclusivity deal" a real thing that can be backed up with evidence, or not? I legitimately wanna know if anyone can help.
I've been looking for legitimate reasons why Square hasn't ported 1.5, 2.5, & 2.8 to Xbox One yet & are waiting till after KHIII comes out to come to a decision about it. In my opinion, this is completely asinine, since if III comes to the platform, logically, the previous titles should also. Reasons I keep coming across are as follows:
1. They're focusing on KHIII's development. This is mainly for a Switch port of III, but I feel it could be applied to the HD collections as well to an extent.
2. Nomura doesn't believe there's a lot of support outside of North America (in which case, wouldn't just a region-specific or digital-only release to minimize costs suffice?). It also crosses with people believing sales figures of their games on Xbox also play a role, but if that were true, they'd have just dropped the console family entirely by now, especially since Microsoft helped them produce Rise of the Tomb Raider.
3. An exclusivity deal with Sony for the earlier main games (KHI & II) restricting the platforms that the collections can appear on. I keep hearing this from some news outlets & people online, but my search towards an actual answer has turned up fruitless on whether or not this is actually a true thing.
So, is there actually, in writing, or an interview, or something, that actually says anything legitimate about an exclusivity deal. What makes this less believable for me is the fact that, outside of the main games, the handheld games are all on Nintendo handhelds, minus BBS. Also, the fact that there's been an Xbox One release since its announcement leaves me to believe this isn't really a thing. I, honestly, think this is hearsay drummed up by some fans somewhere years ago trying to justify to themselves why the series is only on Sony systems without actually thinking through their logic hard enough. Not only that, but with III coming to the system, denying Xbox players the collections is bad, not only because they're stories are things you'll need to know for III, but the games can be really fun, especially KHII. Denying Xbox players the opportunity to play the games outside of buying another console that they're probably not interested in is kinda detrimental tot he series. Nomura has also stated it's a possibility to do in the future. So, is this "exclusivity deal" a real thing that can be backed up with evidence, or not? I legitimately wanna know if anyone can help.