this game is easy. we count from 1 to 50 and if a mod puts a number we have to start over. But if another mod posts right after the first mod it would be -1 okexample:member 1member 2mod 0mod -1member 0ok i'll start1EDIT: 

Records:

First time we reach 50.Member's Best Record: 383

Mod's best record: -1022

-927(?)

-926

Edited July 4, 20169 yr by Kingdom Key D

-937

Isn't it beautiful?

-1022 is the most beautiful number.

-924

-923?

-924

Sorry about the 30, though. I can't count in the summer.

-925!

 

-1022 is so beautiful, we should make it the new start point

Perhaps -1111?

You know what?  When the count is negative, members should be able to reset to 0.

Nah that would be boring

 

-926!

You know what?  When the count is negative, members should be able to reset to 0.

 

Nope. You don't get to change the rules that were established from the start. It's called Avoid the MODERATORS for a reason. Not avoid the members.

Still not below 900? Lol...

You know what?  When the count is negative, members should be able to reset to 0.

Wouldn't that be a little unfair. There are a lot less mods then there are members. They have to work a lot harder to even get into the negatives.

Edited July 4, 20169 yr by Robbie the Wise

Nope. You don't get to change the rules that were established from the start. It's called Avoid the MODERATORS for a reason. Not avoid the members.

Whoa, chill. I was joking. No reason to go all mega authority on me.

Still not below 900? Lol...Wouldn't that be a little unfair. There are a lot less mods then there are members. They have to work a lot harder to even get into the negatives.

I'm in no way challenging the rules here, but since you mentioned it: It only requires two mods to get to the negatives regardless of what number we're on, but the members have been posting for five days and we're still nowhere zero. How does that not sound unfair?Now keep in mind that I'm not trying to change the rules here, I was only replying to what someone else said. Fair or not, I'm happy to play the games by the established rules.

-927 C:

Whoa, chill. I was joking. No reason to go all mega authority on me.I'm in no way challenging the rules here, but since you mentioned it: It only requires two mods to get to the negatives regardless of what number we're on, but the members have been posting for five days and we're still nowhere zero. How does that not sound unfair?Now keep in mind that I'm not trying to change the rules here, I was only replying to what someone else said. Fair or not, I'm happy to play the games by the established rules.

 

The point went completely over your head. The idea is to avoid the MODS. Not members. Think about it lol. Secondly there are wayyyyyy more members that could easily help you count back than there are mods. By far. The numbers are in your favor so deal with it

Whoa, chill. I was joking. No reason to go all mega authority on me.I'm in no way challenging the rules here, but since you mentioned it: It only requires two mods to get to the negatives regardless of what number we're on, but the members have been posting for five days and we're still nowhere zero. How does that not sound unfair?Now keep in mind that I'm not trying to change the rules here, I was only replying to what someone else said. Fair or not, I'm happy to play the games by the established rules.

Because the members far outnumber the mods. If the members organize better it's a lot easier for them to amass numbers. The mods aren't always consistently active but their advantage is they coordinate a lot better. That's been the members problem from the get go. Plus you guys gave up pretty quickly and let them get this high.

Whoa, chill. I was joking. No reason to go all mega authority on me.I'm in no way challenging the rules here, but since you mentioned it: It only requires two mods to get to the negatives regardless of what number we're on, but the members have been posting for five days and we're still nowhere zero. How does that not sound unfair?Now keep in mind that I'm not trying to change the rules here, I was only replying to what someone else said. Fair or not, I'm happy to play the games by the established rules.

 

This:

Because the members far outnumber the mods. If the members organize better it's a lot easier for them to amass numbers. The mods aren't always consistently active but their advantage is they coordinate a lot better. That's been the members problem from the get go. Plus you guys gave up pretty quickly and let them get this high.

 

There's no excuse to let the number go down below -1000 Especially since most of it was done by 2 mods. Would have been easy to prevent that, if the members were better organized.

Still not below 900? Lol...

 

Wouldn't that be a little unfair. There are a lot less mods then there are members. They have to work a lot harder to even get into the negatives.

This: There's no excuse to let the number go down below -1000 Especially since most of it was done by 2 mods. Would have been easy to prevent that, if the members were better organized.

Exactly it was allowed to happen because everyone gave up.

0

0

nice try

 

-926!

It wasn't just two mods but at times there were only two mods ...

 

 

0

-25252757365363733356353

 

Fixed

Let's throw a party!

*eats cookies*

It wasn't just two mods but at times there were only two mods ...

 

 

 

Fixed

And one member All the other members were too lazy to help me 

And one member All the other members were too lazy to help me 

 

 

Muahahahhahahahahhahahhahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha!

 

 

 

PS. Quota guys