Kingdomhe

Then they should have shown those games when everybody was watching during the presentation, they had a full hour so that was plenty of time. The system is coming out in March and they have done a poor job at trying to sell us this thing before it's release. Even though Ps4 and Xbox one didn't have the best release, they still had a good amount of games, good or bad, on launch and showed us them during their events.

The same could be said about console, the only difference is that there are no more choices (other than PC, but not everyone can afford or can make a gaming PC), their all doing it now. but now that everyone is doing it, someones head is going to be on the chopping block.

So you saying it might have a 2018 release but get delayed into 2019 like 2.8?

This year or...?

Ps4 store takes for ever to load, is glitchy, errors, hackers, browser is crappy and was better on ps3, laggy games (I know they aren't really responsible for this one, but online gameplay is what your paying them for ). I've never had Xbox live so I can't speak for them.

Also, did anyone notice the they did even mention the specs apart from the battery life. And MK8 deluxe could have been an update or dlc for the Wii u ver. But Nintendo wants the money, so they will make you buy it again. woooooooow, really! Power to ya man, I just hope we don't have a wiiu2 on our hands. that's what they said about the Wii u and here we are. either way it's still expinsive. But, that sucks man. Except the thing is, it's not exclusive to only the NX. You could save $299+ and just buy it on Wii u which a lot of people who wanted to game already have. Yet we still have problems with these servers that we are paying $59 a year for. Fair enough, I didn't like a lot of games that launched with the ps4 or Xbox one ether, but at least they had a lot of games that came out at launch good or not. Port that you will have to pay for again like 3ds Ver.

It doesn't seem worth it to get on day one or maybe even this year. It's seems like a combo of the Wii U's and PS3's launch, no games and to expensive. It doesn't matter what the other companies' consoles cost at their launch, the here and now is the thing costs $299 with pretty much no launch titles vs. PS4 and Xbox that has a well established library for the same cost or less depending on which one you get. I'm not willing to pay over $300 for a Zelda machine, I could just get it for the Wii U but cheaper. The controllers are really expensive, $79 and for the separate (L) or ( R ) Joy-cons $49. Now your paying for Online which I hate, it was the one thing I loved Nintendo for and it was the edge they had over everybody else. Plus, the games that they are giving away are only going to be old ones that we have seen and played before and nothing new. Also, the way they are wording it makes it seem like you could either loose them after a month or you could keep them. Plus, the battery life is kind of vague too. I'm not saying it's a bad console, but the way that they are handling it is weird, they are expecting people to shuck out money like hard candy on launch but since the wii u, I don't think that's going to happen given what we've been shown (maybe if they had shown Overwatch or Smash or something hard hitting coming out in march). I'll probably get one when the price goes down, but I still won't be happy about the Subscription fee for online.

@SRK Not really @Xiro That's irrelevant. The here and now is the thing costs 299 with pretty much no launch titles vs. PS4 and Xbox that has a well established library for the same cost. I'm not willing to pay over $300 for a Zelda machine, I could just get it for the Wii U but cheaper.

I'm not really impressed by the switch anymore... Too costly!

The sad part is that I think it was a guy I was subed too, but I unsubed because I saw he had the game early and I called my self trying to have foresight... At least it wasn't kh3.

I WAS FREAKING SPOILED BY A MOTHERCLUCKING THUMBNAIL!!! THE SON OF A JACKCAL DECIDED NOT MAKE A THUMBNAIL AND USED IN-GAME SCREEN SHOTS, SO NOW I KNOW THE END OF FIRETRUCKING 0.2!

This was the one that I made in 2015 : http://kh13.com/forum/topic/90861-when-do-you-think-kh3-will-release/ and a lot of people said 2017, but now that the new interview has knocked that out, when do you think it will come out now? I'm still sticking with 2019.

a lot of them seem very annoying, like Kindred Spirits.

I'm getting triggered by 3D's trophy list.

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

friday

that's because there aren't, there are only special portals. This isn't spoiler territory.

Year ain't over yet

Currently I think Sora is 16 and a half-ish, Riku is 17and a half-ish. My reasoning is that Sora started his journey either on his birthday or a couple months after his birthday when he was 14 and thanks to days we have a time line and it took a year and a half to for Sora and co. to beat Ansem and clear C.O. So when we start KH2 he wasn't a clean 15 and since that journey was longer than KH1's he most likely turned 16 once he got back home. After KH2 there was some time between KH2 and Coded, Coded and the bottle reaching them, blank points, 3D, and then time Sora took off on his own. So by KH3 he should be at least 16 and a half imo, but he is definitely at least 16. Now Ven is easy because he is 14 in BBS so just add 10 years and some change and that's Ven's age now. But Terra and Aqua are harder the only way I can pin point them is through Xemnas, I think in and interview or something Xemnas and Ansem were in their 30s, I could be wrong because I can't remember but that's what I thought and since Xemnas is Terra's body it should they should be the same. So Terra is probably between 20 - 25 because he is still young enough to be naive and Aqua is ether the same or is a few years younger like 19 or 18 and then just add 10 years to that for their current age.

True, but didn't they get a co-director for it? That might help. The story was good, but it definitely wasn't a masterpiece.

No because apparently what all the fans want is KH FREAKING 3 AND NOW NOW NOOOOOW!!!!! Sorry, lost my cool there for a sec. Anyway, I don't really care about ffxv anymore, it's kind of old news now. Whether it's 10 years or 3, the way they handled it was bad, the fact that you need to watch a movie, anime, and play an app game before you understand the story or start to care about the charactars isn't good (and don't get me started on this DLC crap they are pulling). The gameplay is great from what I've heard, seen, and played but something still rubs me the wrong way about it for some reason but I can't place my finger on it. while it has been in dev for 3 years it still was announced 10 years ago, so it's still a 10 year game as far as I'm concern, SE should stop announcing things soooooooooo early. Bottomline, even though I like the game (because I did watch the movie and all that stuff minus the app game before looking at the game), I don't want this to happen to kh3.

They said that it would happen after 2.8 is out for everyone.

Just pre ordered 2.8 on PSN, I'm happy with my choice.

Whew, my SR is back at 2000!