Varnish

Mental note: People are not liked for expressing their opinions.

@Zola: Say what, exactly?

Either way, removing the fire was a questionable and unnecessary move. I said mild swears; along the lines of what Axel said in the original Chain of Memories. Adding blood would make some scenes look more dramatic, and would make them have more of an impact on the player. The death scenes are not particularly intense. The deaths of Vexen and Zexion were about as intense as they get, and even then, Vexen's death scene was censored in the PS2 remake of Chain of Memories. http://kh13.com/forum/topic/64909-im-getting-sick-of-kingdom-hearts-being-so-censored/page-1

@Dave: Most likely; probably due to the fact that that is not true.

It depends on what my responsibilities would be.

No, but I do not feel like explaining the details here.

@Zola: Many people think that the series is "co-owned".

The censorship in the series is unbelievably overdone. Removing one second of flames being depicted on Axel's body in Kingdom Hearts II was not even slightly necessary, the mild swear word that Axel gave in the original Chain of Memories did not need to be removed from his dialogue in the PS2 remake, and censoring Aqua's clothing was not necessary either. Those are just a few examples. The Final Fantasy series has always had less intense censorship. What is the harm in Kingdom Hearts trying to go in accordance to this? What I want is simple; an occasional mild swear word, at least one scene per game that depicts blood, and more intense death scenes. I know that I am not the only one who is "getting worked up about it"; there was a thread about the subject that was created the other day.

Dog

And a lack of censorship is needed for an appeal to the Final Fantasy audience.

@Light Guardian: The fact that they own the series.

I thought that Disney had a good role in the series as well, until I learned their terrible secret...

Kingdom Hearts - Disney = ?

The KH series needs less censorship. The amount of censorship that Square Enix is being forced to use in the series is not natural for them.

What is the joke?

It is not overrated; at least not the part that does not involve Disney.

It depends on how it would be presented.

Thank you.

I am sorry about that. I was going to ask about something that slightly bothers me, but I decided that it was not worth talking about.

I am aware of that, but its existence is still extremely strange. I own a GBA cartridge that contains both Rayman 3 and Winnie The Pooh's Rumbly-Tumbly Adventure.

Should I even bother questioning this?

http://31.media.tumblr.com/ae5a1e3b03c18ef7511ee7f89e7df7fa/tumblr_mw6p30HHbE1qzeifoo1_250.jpg

I miss the days when touch-screen cell-phones and social networking were not as popular as they are now.

How unfortunate.