Moshroca97

well, the game just came out over here so I was kind of expecting a few bugs and issues. It's the first day so they still have time to fix the issues.

I change my mind and went with Vulpes. I think i went with Vulpes in both japanese versions. Also, it may just be my phone, but does they frame rate seem kind of bad while exploring?

I just want to know what everyone else is joining. I'm downlading the game rn and I'm trying to think whether to pick Ursus or Unicornis.

Yes, you have a lot of good points there, but on the other hand not all PC ports are good, especially with some of the ones that Square Enix has made for previous console games and not only that, developing a PC port this late into the development cycle of namely Kingdom Hearts 3 would make it extremely difficult to release the game in the time frame they want to. At least Tabata has even expressed interest in making a PC port for FFXV, but that is only AFTER the game is out on consoles first. As far as 60 FPS, yes, it looks smoother, but especially for old games it firetrucks with the physics. I'm fairly sure that more developers now adays are more concerned whether the game plays correctly and look as best it can rather than worrying about how smooth the FPS is. I acknowledge how good 60 fps looks and how powerful PC really are, but a big issue with PC releases is compatibility. Not everyone can exactly has the money to fork over hundreds of dollars for a new motherboard, RAM, GPU and a CPU for newer games on the market. Consoles, while inferior, don't generally have compatibility issues and tend to be more affordable to the general public. I am probably going to get shot down, but I do hope I made some good points.

Same. Now adays its a miracle that some games can even run 30 FPS let alone 60. FFXV is going to be a massive game so I don't think that really helps either and they are having frame rate issues that they have tried to contract outside help for. My assumption is that Sony at the time was trying to go for what was going to try to give them the most power and what was most affordable for producing the console. Decide hardware for consoles is kind of a crap shoot anyway.Then again not everyone can afford a high end pc. I have a GeForce GT610 and my motherboard is about 13 years old for crying out loud. If I could upgrade so I could play more pc games I would. lol

*cough cough* Coded. *cough*

No love for Cait Sith? Or Red XIII? Or Barret? :c

QUINTON TALKING TO HIMSELF? Oh god...

I don't know much about Hitman, but Final Fantasy 7 wise they made it episodic because if they didn't it would a) take longer to develop as one game and b) they would have to remove a lot of content. They wouldn't do something like that to Kingdom Hearts 3 this far in development because that would be a lot more work than they need.

That video was great! I kinda reminded me of Swoozie a bit, with the bits of humor thrown in. You did good.

That sounds awesome to be honest.

I think you make a pretty good point there. They also could be doing intermingling with plot lines of Twilight Town and Mysterious Tower like they did briefly at the beginning of 2, but it's anyone's guess at this point.

Alright, so I might catch a lot of flack for this, but never the less it was something I just observed so I felt it would be something worth talking over. Now, I know Yen Sid's tower has appeared in several Kingdom Hearts games since 2, such as Birth by Sleep and 3D, but in the most recent trailer from Jump Festa it's notable that the train tracks are not present in the footage that was given to us. Now I'm sure you guys are probably like, "The train was really only for plot convenience and they group the worlds together for that reason as well!" Blah blah blah. However, the past two games that Yen Sid's tower has been in have technically taken place in the past and don't show too much evidence, with Symphony of Sorcery having it as it as it's own word and taking place way before Mickey meets Sora and Riku. As well as Birth by Sleep having only Yen Sid's tower present. Now, KH3 has been the first game in the series to include both Twilight Town and Mysterious Tower since KH2, so could it be safe to say these world no longer connected as of KHIII? It was just something on my mind so sorry for my rambling. =3=

I'm not too surprised. They did the same thing with Final Fantasy 4: The After Years.

SE is like Oprah up in here. "You get a Keyblade! you get a Keyblade! EVERYONE GETS A KEYBLADE!"

I knew this would happen. KNEW IT!

I'd love to take part in the podcast, but I feel like I haven't been on the forums long enough to really be in one. Is that any sort of restriction to joining? If not, I'm all for it!

With Square's track record, probably not. lol

Why does FFXV even matter when it comes to KH3? They are two DIFFERENT properties. So what if they release the same year as each other? I main yeah they are two main series games and they both have the potiential of being very successful, but unless I hear Square say they are not going to release Kingdom Hearts 3 and Final Fantasy XV in the same year, I'm still gonna believe that Kingdom Hearts 3 and FFXV are going to be coming out the same year, with 2.8 coming out as well. If I'm proven wrong? So what. I'm sick and tired of people making assumptions about release dates just because another game is coming around that same time and it HAPPENS to be that it is being developed by Square Enix. I don't know, you don't know. There no point in saying something confirms or deconfirms something. I'm pretty sure Square will do anything that makes them the most money, not because one or more of their properties is being released in the same year.

I still believe it could be a 2016 release. If they had been working on this since they finished 2.5, it could be still possible. With Kingdom Hearts 3 being how it is right now with mainly just mass world creation that needs to be done I don't see why not.

Now, if this is the title that was being referred to on the Linkin page for 2.9, then we know that Kingdom Hearts HD 2.8 Final Chapter Prologue has been in development for quite a while now along Kingdom Hearts 3. So isn't it fair to say that Kingdom Hearts 3 could still be released Late 2016? I mean there have been several franchises that have had 2 games release in one year, so who is it to say that Kingdom Hearts can't do the same. As well, it's not as like 2.8 is really doing anything different from 1.5 and 2.5. It's all ready been said that KHX Back Cover is going to be a short story, which is probably not going to take all too much of their resources. In theory they only really need to worry about DDDHD and BBS 0.2 and DDDHD is just making things HD. Now, depending how long they want to make BBS 0.2, that could take quite a bit of resources, but being that it is being developed on the UR4 engine they probably already have several assets from Kingdom Heart 3 they could use for 0.2. With that being said, can we stop calling people stupid for hoping for a Late 2016 release date?