In Dissidia and Dissidia 012,those two games were described in their datalog as prequels to FF1 and it explained the origins of Garland and the character Cid of the Lufaine.
The origins of Garland were revealed in the Cosmos reports that you collect through the game(The chaos reports are all about the other villians)
And that the war of the gods between Cosmos and Chaos has occured before the event of FF1.If you remember Dissida's Ending,the Warrior of Light was walking towards the same castle from FF1 where Princess Sarah lives.
I know that the stories of the series so far are seperate but if you looked carefully at them you'll find things that ties them together in different timelines.
Again,I don't if Square Enix never confirmed that every game in the series are either connected or have nothing to do with each other
But think of this,if all heroes of the series were gathered in one game(Dissidia 012) that was actually a prequel to FF1
Does that mean that FF1 would be the last one in terms of occurance if a timeline for Final Fantasy actually exist???
I know some people here will tear me apart and say: NO ,FF GAMES HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
But think about it,you can find many things hidden in the games that reference other games in the series in one way or another
Maybe there is something that connects all of them together.
And no,technological improvements in games like FF7 or FF13 doesn't prove that they might be far away in the future.
I know the planet has been named differently in some games but for most FF games the planet is named Gaia(Which obviously earth)
What if Gran Pulse(when it reforms again in the end of XIII timeline) becomes Gaia later on.
I know I could be wrong and I could be flammed by the FF fanbase like always.But I don't care,I just wanted to tell you guys what I think of.
I mean,if Zelda has it's own twists in their timeline despite differences between each Zelda game,what prevents Final Fantasy from having a timeline???
The reason I'm asking this is because:
In Dissidia and Dissidia 012,those two games were described in their datalog as prequels to FF1 and it explained the origins of Garland and the character Cid of the Lufaine.
The origins of Garland were revealed in the Cosmos reports that you collect through the game(The chaos reports are all about the other villians)
And that the war of the gods between Cosmos and Chaos has occured before the event of FF1.If you remember Dissida's Ending,the Warrior of Light was walking towards the same castle from FF1 where Princess Sarah lives.
I know that the stories of the series so far are seperate but if you looked carefully at them you'll find things that ties them together in different timelines.
Again,I don't if Square Enix never confirmed that every game in the series are either connected or have nothing to do with each other
But think of this,if all heroes of the series were gathered in one game(Dissidia 012) that was actually a prequel to FF1
Does that mean that FF1 would be the last one in terms of occurance if a timeline for Final Fantasy actually exist???
I know some people here will tear me apart and say: NO ,FF GAMES HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
But think about it,you can find many things hidden in the games that reference other games in the series in one way or another
Maybe there is something that connects all of them together.
And no,technological improvements in games like FF7 or FF13 doesn't prove that they might be far away in the future.
I know the planet has been named differently in some games but for most FF games the planet is named Gaia(Which obviously earth)
What if Gran Pulse(when it reforms again in the end of XIII timeline) becomes Gaia later on.
I know I could be wrong and I could be flammed by the FF fanbase like always.But I don't care,I just wanted to tell you guys what I think of.
I mean,if Zelda has it's own twists in their timeline despite differences between each Zelda game,what prevents Final Fantasy from having a timeline???