Note: This is a special chat topic! This means that posts can be shorter and more casual here. Posts here are linked with and may appear on our Discord server.

No, it is a fact, because all of these things were base game in 1&2

And we only have three numbered titles

The side games are something else and always have been

again it's not a fact

I can see why they weren't in the base game. Those two keyblades are now more intigrated into Roxas than they ever were with Sora, especially as that's what he wields now

that's just your opinion

It is literally a fact that all of this stuff was in 1&2.

In the base

And we do only have three numbered titles

tarzan was in kh1 but not in 2

there's no rule that says they have to be in a base game

Having both Roxas and Sora having the same keyblades is most likely something they didn't want to do, and giving away Oathkeeper is becasue of the feedback they got after it released

That's some serious whatabotism Noleen

Sorry Quid, but I agree with Liftea

eh

you justify thing like shit so i use a shitty example

No, you're right there isn't a "rule", but there is an expectation of these things that Square Enix themselves creates.

There's no rule saying those things must be in the main games

would have been cool tho to have oblivion with riku and oath with kairi

You can, however, make an argument that the inclusion of such things at base would have improved the experience

...

Maybe that's what I'm trying to say, I don't know.

I certainly would

what do you mean multiple people cant use same keyblade?

oathkeeper and oblivion are 10/10 just in kh2 bc it was literally just copy and paste the assets like 40% of kh2 is just copy and paste

Like, ok, dead tired example, but let's go

Final Fantasy

All I know is that these things are something I would expect to be in the base game.

all you should expect is bad story writing

Is it a rule that Final Fantasy should've been in the game? No. But it would've been good if it were

Subjective tbh