Note: This is a special chat topic! This means that posts can be shorter and more casual here. Posts here are linked with and may appear on our Discord server.

Kusco would LOVE that pun.

Too bad the games don't look that crisp

the funny thing is I dont know if Kuzco did puns

I feel like every day

I see some new blizzard shit

wow #firetruckblizzard

read the article

i feel like im not gonna hear the end of blizz on any feed

B O N E IS GETTING A SHOW

Yeaaaaah

Blizzard is trying very hard not to be political

But also be very political

And biased in their reasoning

Blizzard can't prevent political discussions. They should just ignore it

But the problem is

They are getting involved because if effects one of their biggest markets

It's better to explain than just ban and make it seem like they are censoring people.

China won't ban blizzard just because someone said in a stream free hong kong. Yes it's well known that China is strict but they aren't that strict. Blizzard made the situation basically worser bc now everyone talks about this

their pr is pretty incompetent

I mean they tried to explain that it wasnt because of the Free Hong Kong messages but it's very hard to believe that they did it for any other reason

Especially with the case of the two hosts and the esports player

it's because of the free hong kong message but it would have been the same with any other political message

"we aren't banning these people because they offend one of our largest markets, and therefore affects our money, it just looks that way"

I dunno, I think you could have said firetruck trump and gotten away with it

also nobody outside china understand what happens in china

Sure but the point is they are trying to cover up why they did it very poorly.

I disagree

That's what foreign correspondents do for us

yeah because trump is free to insult for some reason i still don't understand

And I dont agree that any other political reason would have done this

This is a very big issue

nah it's not until there is another case that prove it