Sorry if this topic is against regulations.

 

 

 

 

thats because the ports were of games that had been out for more than a year

 

what? I'm not talking about the Re: series or something, the original ones. BBS, CoM, 3D, and 358/2D were released same year in JP and NA

what? I'm not talking about the Re: series or something, the original ones. BBS, CoM, 3D, and 358/2D were released same year in JP and NA

ah, but anything kh related sells like platinum encrusted hotcakes. im sure it would be a success regardless of sony microsoft or nintendo

ah, but anything kh related sells like platinum encrusted hotcakes. im sure it would be a success regardless of sony microsoft or nintendo

 

 

definitely but you gotta think, even though this is a re-release and it's not like they're making a new game, they want to make a big profit margin, like sales to units. I'm just playing the devil's advocate here and trying to reason as to why this decision was made and that's the best reason I can think of.

Edited October 5, 201312 yr by soramstr

There is NO JRPG Market on the US for Xbox ConsolesNah you're the one who's mad

Denial much? You seem to be a cyber bully on the site...

There is NO JRPG Market on the US for Xbox Consoles

That's a fact

 

What about Lost Odyssey, Blue Dragon, Tales of Vesperia, Star Ocean: The Last Hope, FF etc etc

There's a gap in the market that can easily be exploited. There are plenty of KH fans who would happily buy the games if it's released on the console they own, but they don't cause they aren't gonna piss their money about on one console for one game.  If it's no extra bother to create the game as a multi-platformer (as it is in the case of KH3), why would you not expand your market and potential profit.  The exclusivity of the series being on only certain consoles is what causes a lot of old fans to abandon the series and turns a lot of potential customers to not even bother (e.g. "well there's no point getting this game, I'll have to buy 7 other consoles just to follow the story properly").  If anything, they could simply produce less discs of the Xbox/Xbone version and see how well it performs, the production costs will still be the same cause they're making both versions on the PC and down-porting.  

What about Lost Odyssey, Blue Dragon, Tales of Vesperia, Star Ocean: The Last Hope, FF etc etc

There's a gap in the market that can easily be exploited. There are plenty of KH fans who would happily buy the games if it's released on the console they own, but they don't cause they aren't gonna piss their money about on one console for one game.  If it's no extra bother to create the game as a multi-platformer (as it is in the case of KH3), why would you not expand your market and potential profit.  The exclusivity of the series being on only certain consoles is what causes a lot of old fans to abandon the series and turns a lot of potential customers to not even bother (e.g. "well there's no point getting this game, I'll have to buy 7 other consoles just to follow the story properly").  If anything, they could simply produce less discs of the Xbox/Xbone version and see how well it performs, the production costs will still be the same cause they're making both versions on the PC and down-porting.  

All those games probably sold more on PS3 and very little on 360

Denial much? You seem to be a cyber bully on the site...

LMFAO

NO.

I personally think it should've been released on Xbox 360 just because KH3 is being released on Xbox One. It would make sense. But whatever, it doesn't affect me.

It already doesn't make sense cause it is on Xbox1.

Just follow it on wikipedia or youtube is the only option.

Also, HD capabilties don't really factor in to this cus seeing what they did with 1.5, it's not that big of a leap. Some parts are gorgeous like the dream part of the beginning and ending cutscenes but everything else is really ordinary. Nothing Xbox or even Wii-U can't do.

 

The ending isn't even rendered in HD.

If 1.5 were going to be on 360, Square would have released it from the start.