What the firetruck... I'm Christian and to say this is really, really bizarre is an understatement...

I have no words for it either. :|

Wow, I mean, I'm a hardcore Christian but I see nothing wrong with atheists. Just believe what you want to believe and roll with it, no need to concern yourself with others' religions.

:blink: eh.... what the firetruck did i just watch

Didn't need to watch. just read the title to understand what's going on.

I have no problem with atheists. As long as they are good people, I don't care. I don't push them to believe in God or anything. Its their choice, move on. Next topic of discussion.

Wow, I mean, I'm a hardcore Christian but I see nothing wrong with atheists. Just believe what you want to believe and roll with it, no need to concern yourself with others' religions.

Wow. Are you really a Christian DD?

i like how the title and the content of the video makes me believe that some people dont think that anybody could be a rapist--christian, atheist or any other person.

From the title I already know this is misguided bullcock

I don't like this guy, but I agree that this law is silly.

While I can't say I agree with the law. But look at it this way, the legal system is heavily based on the teachings of the Qu'Ran. And their motto is "There is no god but God; Muhammad is the messenger of God."So quite possibly they see any attack against the Muslim theology as an attack against the very foundations of their country. Thus it is only a logical conclusion that they would label it at terrorism. Especially if the country doesn't have freedom of speech. If the US didn't have freedom of speech, I wouldn't doubt we would get terrorism charges if we were arguing with the original constitution and the declaration of independence.And why wouldn't the US or many other countries try to oppose that law? Well, Saudi Arabia is still one of the largest exporters of quality oil. So, basically they could force oil prices to skyrocket in your country if you upset them.

 

He is taking the question from the survey the wrong way. (I do agree that it is EXTREMELY POORLY DESIGNED!) In my opinion why the atheists were selected more in it was because they think of atheists as people and rapists as rapists.I wouldn't doubt that it isn't because they think the rapists are better, but because think all that rapists are, are rapists. That's their whole existence is lurking in the shadows waiting to get some unsuspecting female or in "rare" cases males.

Basically what I am saying if they asked the question "who is more likely to be a rapists, an atheist or a thief." I'll bet they will pick the atheist more times than not for the simple reason, a thief is thought of as a thief and not as a rapist, yet an atheist is thought of as a human being.

I could be wrong with my theory, but if I am right his whole argument against people is flawed. It isn't because they think atheists are evil, but because they think they are people that can do anything.While someone labeled by an action is more likely to be thought of as ONLY doing that action. Like would you think a teenage boy or a teenage programmer is going to work at a grocery store checkout? Both might be likely to take that job if they need/want money, but I am pretty sure most people would pick teenage boy instead of programmer.And again I haven't tested my theory. But it seems to make sense. And honestly his argument is using just as many "facts" as my speculation.

 

Sometimes that guy makes good points, but recently and in the past I just see him raging. Beating a horse dead and beyond, so even if he had a point he hit it so many times it makes me want to cringe.

 

That's all I can think of saying at this time.