2.8's X section has been bugging me all day. The lines: "I found the traitor" followed by "I don't believe there is one among us", "Are we all going to turn against one another?" and "It's written on that page that one will betray us all." bother me. I can't help but think that there actually ISN'T a traitor among the lights. But just hear me out: What if the idea of a traitor was planted into the minds of the Foretellers so they would all become suspicious of each other and eventually turn against each other and start the Keyblade War? Suspicion is sometimes the best weapon to use against a group. If some believe that not everyone will keep the whole group safe, they will grow to distrust the others. And in this case, if the Foretellers are trying to weed out a traitor among each other, some might use their Unions to take out one they see as the traitor. If that succeeds, then the other Foretellers may think that the first Union to attack were actually the traitors and attack them. And so and on and so forth until everyone is fighting. The Unions and Foretellers would fight each other to root out a traitor and to keep the world from being engulfed by darkness, but end up doing the exact opposite. All in the pursuit of one person that might not even exist. The suspicion that there is disbelief of a traitor and the question of whether they would really betray each other make me think this even more.
I know the page that says there is a traitor and the inquiry by Chirithy that there is a traitor disproves my theory, but "one that will betray us all" doesn't necessarily pertain ONLY to members of the Foretellers. The one that could betray them could mean the 6th Follower- the Foreteller's fellow pupil. And while the 6th could convince a Foreteller to come to their side and be a traitor, I would think it would make more sense for the 6th to say that there is already a traitor among them- warning them with their "best interest" in mind- and just sit and watch them tear each other apart. That could be what the 6th is doing in this scene (around 15 mins):https://youtu.be/lTBa-ar95Z8?list=PLhcSrKyqhfh5gWWmRv4rISACTyrZbPPsS
This is probably reading too much into the little information that we have. But I can't help but feel like something is wrong/missing. A simple traitor is too obvious. While their reasoning may be complex is there is one, I feel like the idea of a traitor is too simplistic. And KH is ANYTHING but simple....
2.8's X section has been bugging me all day. The lines: "I found the traitor" followed by "I don't believe there is one among us", "Are we all going to turn against one another?" and "It's written on that page that one will betray us all." bother me. I can't help but think that there actually ISN'T a traitor among the lights. But just hear me out: What if the idea of a traitor was planted into the minds of the Foretellers so they would all become suspicious of each other and eventually turn against each other and start the Keyblade War? Suspicion is sometimes the best weapon to use against a group. If some believe that not everyone will keep the whole group safe, they will grow to distrust the others. And in this case, if the Foretellers are trying to weed out a traitor among each other, some might use their Unions to take out one they see as the traitor. If that succeeds, then the other Foretellers may think that the first Union to attack were actually the traitors and attack them. And so and on and so forth until everyone is fighting. The Unions and Foretellers would fight each other to root out a traitor and to keep the world from being engulfed by darkness, but end up doing the exact opposite. All in the pursuit of one person that might not even exist. The suspicion that there is disbelief of a traitor and the question of whether they would really betray each other make me think this even more.
I know the page that says there is a traitor and the inquiry by Chirithy that there is a traitor disproves my theory, but "one that will betray us all" doesn't necessarily pertain ONLY to members of the Foretellers. The one that could betray them could mean the 6th Follower- the Foreteller's fellow pupil. And while the 6th could convince a Foreteller to come to their side and be a traitor, I would think it would make more sense for the 6th to say that there is already a traitor among them- warning them with their "best interest" in mind- and just sit and watch them tear each other apart. That could be what the 6th is doing in this scene (around 15 mins):https://youtu.be/lTBa-ar95Z8?list=PLhcSrKyqhfh5gWWmRv4rISACTyrZbPPsS
This is probably reading too much into the little information that we have. But I can't help but feel like something is wrong/missing. A simple traitor is too obvious. While their reasoning may be complex is there is one, I feel like the idea of a traitor is too simplistic. And KH is ANYTHING but simple....
AND CLEAN
Edited by awesomeinmyworld