I wanted to make this topic to point out the differences between Japanese reviewers like Famitsu and English reviewers like IGN. I don't have time to go and put every link for the reviews, but here are some quotes.
Kingdom Hearts 3D
Famitsu- "I love the drop system! There are times when you drop in a boss battle, and it makes you try even harder to beat the boss as fast as you can!
IGN: "I like the drop system, although it can get pretty annoying when you drop in a boss battle, they should have changed that."
Final Fantasy XIII
Famitsu- "Even though the game is pretty straightforward, the luscious, beautiful environments always give you something to look at."
IGN: "The game is too linear, and the environments aren't that great to look at because the camera is terrible."
Theatrhythm Final Fantasy Curtain Call
Famitsu- "I love how Square Enix put in more of my favorite songs and characters, it feels like a new experience!"
IGN: "The game just feels like an expansion pack, although there are new elements, it's not worth it buying the game a second time."
I remembered reading in an article somewhere that western reviewers are very harsh, like on movies, television, and video games. While most reviewers in the east are very grateful for what is given to them, even if it's not that good. It just shows the difference in how we look at things. I wonder if it changes the public we view things as well? We're too scared to try out a video game or watch a movie because we don't want to waste our time if it's bad, so we let other people do it. But we may be missing out on something we would really enjoy. What is your opinion?
I wanted to make this topic to point out the differences between Japanese reviewers like Famitsu and English reviewers like IGN. I don't have time to go and put every link for the reviews, but here are some quotes.
Kingdom Hearts 3D
Famitsu- "I love the drop system! There are times when you drop in a boss battle, and it makes you try even harder to beat the boss as fast as you can!
IGN: "I like the drop system, although it can get pretty annoying when you drop in a boss battle, they should have changed that."
Final Fantasy XIII
Famitsu- "Even though the game is pretty straightforward, the luscious, beautiful environments always give you something to look at."
IGN: "The game is too linear, and the environments aren't that great to look at because the camera is terrible."
Theatrhythm Final Fantasy Curtain Call
Famitsu- "I love how Square Enix put in more of my favorite songs and characters, it feels like a new experience!"
IGN: "The game just feels like an expansion pack, although there are new elements, it's not worth it buying the game a second time."
I remembered reading in an article somewhere that western reviewers are very harsh, like on movies, television, and video games. While most reviewers in the east are very grateful for what is given to them, even if it's not that good. It just shows the difference in how we look at things. I wonder if it changes the public we view things as well? We're too scared to try out a video game or watch a movie because we don't want to waste our time if it's bad, so we let other people do it. But we may be missing out on something we would really enjoy. What is your opinion?