Are you fine with that? Both games can tell differnet stories during KH3. One game can about Sora while the other is about Roxas or Riku.

Edited September 21, 201510 yr by ラッキー

Okay, I thought you were talking about what they did with the Hobbit or the last Hunger Games book.

If Square could make it engaging without it being too repetitive and the two games fit together alright, I'd be for it.

No. It should be one game.

I came into this topic ready to say "Blood will be spilled on the steps of Square Enix Japan".  I thought you meant in the sense of how most book movies are doing it with two parts for the ending movie.  I would be fine with this idea as long as the first game (Sora) feels complete and concise.  I feel it would be a better route just to make KH III all Sora, and maybe offer the chance to play for a short story of some other character, but not another 30+ hours worth.

Someone else has already said this a few days ago, and I will say the same as then: I wouldn't be surprised at all (in fact, I find it quite possible), but then I'm probably quiting on playing both of them (and that would make it my last KH game, I just feel so ennoyed when I see how SE uses KH to earn money now, it used to be my favourite game, you know?).

I hate it when companies split things into 2 parts just to grab money i want the full experience at one time

Not really. And I doubt Square would do something like that. 

I wouldn't mind one game on two disks, but they'd have to be released at the same time, in the same case. We know Riku and Sora are each on their own mission and each are equally important so his side should really be playable, even though traditionally only Sora is playable in numbered titles. Though these days the data size of disks is so large that there's no need for multi-disk games anymore unless the story is like 100hrs, not counting side quests, so unless KH3 is that massive I can't see it happening.

Edited September 21, 201510 yr by Isamu_Kuno

No. Just no.

They could do that, but as long as they don't divide the game itself into two.Like the first they release works perfectly fine and fits into the story with Sora as the main character and doesn't leave any plot holes.The second can be the kind of game that is completely optional, but we just play the game through a different characters perspective maybe we with a few different worlds or bosses.Unfortunately I doubt the second game will work well, and it probably won't be able to bring enough money for SE + Disney to even consider it

Do I look like I can split into two? I cannot pull a Young Xehanort; dividing myself into multiple versions. I will be made whole.

 

 

HECK NO

I hate it when companies split things into 2 parts just to grab money i want the full experience at one time

The only thing that made sense when being split in two was the seventh Harry Potter movie. The book was really big.

If they split they should do it three parts. This should do it:

 

Sora, Donald and Goofy

Riku and Mickey

Kairi and Lea

 

But I would have rather have the system in KH3D.

Ofcourse not the time limit just a switch.

sorry but that's a horrible idea

Please no D:

Worst news would be "Final mission on the keyblade graveyard and ending has been removed"

 

Like in MGSV: Phantom Pain.

Lol, that's a funny joke you made there  :lol: Kingdom Hearts 3 being two games...

No thanks. Kingdom Hearts III deserves and should be one game, not two. 

God no!  :wacko:

Don't we have enough Games already haha.